Rethinking Functioning of Public Libraries from the Perspective of Jürgen Habermas Public Sphere

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Information Science and Knowledge, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran,

2 Ph.D. student, Department of Information Science and Knowledge, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Social Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

4 Professor, Department of Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

5 Assistant Professor, Department of Information Science and Knowledge, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines one of the factors leading to the transformation of public libraries into a social center. It explores how public libraries could become a place for frequent and daily visit for citizens to interact, receive information, and develop knowledge.
Method: The literature of social functions of public libraries and the literature of Public Sphere as proposed by Jürgen Habermas was reviewed. To ensure thoroughness of the review, citation chain technique was used, i.e. each relevant items retrieved was also checked for its citations. If the cited item was not found in databases, it was searched by title and the author name.
Findings: Public Sphere perspective in libraries can be realized in a way that legitimizes social issues and affairs. A public sphere framework can  demonstrate their values and socio-political status. They can offer three areas of discourse, namely, governance and management, legitimation, and commons in the public sphere, as such to establish a two-way communication between the library and the community. The public sphere perspective in libraries can focus on how to manage and establish the legitimacy of public libraries through socially equitable means. A public sphere framework may provide an effective way to express the political and social value of public libraries. Public libraries can offer three areas of public discourse. The three areas connect the library to their community.  Review showed that research in the area could be divided into two thematic categories. The first one examine how libraries function as public sphere infrastructure, the other one examines public libraries. If we expect the library to continue to maintain an actual community, and to attract the community in the time of pervasiveness of social media, it must develop the ability to penetrate the heart of people's lives. As a necessary component for their survival.
Conclusion: Before public libraries become part of the public sphere, research should be conducted to develop a single model.  An operational model is needed then for navigating to proceed. To turn the library to a place for daily use and a place for citizens to meet each other and communicate.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • Aabo, S., Audunson, R., & Varheim, A. (2010). How do public libraries function as meetting places? Library & Information Science Research, 32 (1), 16-26.
  • Aabø, S. & Audunson, R. (2012). Use of library space and the library as place. Library & Information Science Research, 34 (2), 138-149.
  • Alstad, C. & Curry, A. (2003). Public space, public discourse, and public libraries. Libres, 13 (1), 1-19. Andersen, J. & Skouvig, L. (2006). Knowledge organization: a sociohistorical analysis and critique,Library Quarterly, 76 (3), 300-322.
  • Area, M. M. & Pessoa, M. T. R. (2012). From solid to liquid: new literacies to the cultural changes of web 2.0. Comunicar, 19 (38), 13-20.
  • Audunson, R. (1999). Between professional field norms and environmental change impetuses. Library & Information Science Research, 21 (4), 523-552.
  • Audunson, R. (2001). How do Politicians and Central Decision-Makers View Public Libraries? The case of Norway, International Federation of Library Associations & Institutions, 31(2): 174–182.
  • Audunson, R. (2005). The public library as a meeting-place in a multicultural and digital context: the necessity of low-intensive meeting-places. Journal of Documentation, 61 (3), 429-441.
  • Audunson, R. A., Aabo, S., Blomgren, R., Hobohm, H. C., Jochumsen, H., Khosrowjerdi, M., Varheim, A. V. (2019). Public libraries as public sphere institutions: A comparative study of perceptions of the public library’s role in six European countries. Journal of Documentation, 75(6), 1396-1415.
  • Audunson, R., Aabø, S., Blomgren, R., Evjen, S., Jochumsen, H., Larsen, H., Rasmussen, C.H., Vårheim, A., Johnston, J. & Koizumi, M. (2019). Public libraries as an infrastructure for a sustainable public sphere: A comprehensive review of research. Journal of Documentation, 75 (4), 773-790.
  • Audunson, R., Andresen, H., Fagerlid, C., Henningsen, E., Hobohm, H-C, Jochumsen, H, Larsen, H. (2020). Physical places and virtual spaces. Libraries, archives and museums in a digital age. In R. Audunson, H. Andresen, C. Fagerlid, E. Henningsen, H-C Hobohm, H. Jochum-sen, H. Larsen, & T. Vold (Eds.), Libraries, Archives and Museums as Democratic Spaces in a Digital Age. De Gruyter Saur, Munich.
  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • Birdi, B., Wilson, K. & Cocker, J. (2008). The public library, exclusion and empathy: A literature review. Library Review, 57 (8), 576–592.
  • Black, A. & Muddiman, D. (1997). Understanding Community Librarianship: The Public Library in Post-modern Britain. Aldershot: Avebury.
  • Black, A., & Hoare, P. (2006). Libraries and the modern world. In A. Black & P. Hoare (Eds.), The Cambridge history of libraries in Britain and Ireland, 3, 7-18, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Braman, S. (1994). The autopoietic state: communication and democratic potential in the net. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45 (6), 358-368.
  • Buschman, J. E. (2003). Dismantling the Public Sphere: Situating and Sustaining Librarianship in the Age of the New Public Philosophy, Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT.
  • Buschman, J. E. (2005). On libraries and the public sphere. Library Philosophy & Practice, 7 (2), 1-8.
  • Carlsson, H, (2015). Researching Public Libraries and the Social Web, 2006-2012. Journal of Documentation, 71 (4), 632-649.
  • Crespy, A. (2013). Deliberative democracy and the legitimacy of the European Union: a reappraisal of conflict, Political Studies, 62 (1), 81-98.
  • Ebrahimi Minaq, J., Amiri, M., Ameri, M. (2008). Frankfurt School and Critical Theory (Opinions and Theories). SOCIAL SCIENCES BULLETIN. 1 (4), 65-86. ]In Persian[

[ابراهیمی‌مینق، جعفر؛ امیری، محمد؛ عامری، مهدی (1386). مکتب فرانکفورت و نظریه انتقادی (آراء و نظریه‌ها). پژوهشنامه علوم اجتماعی، 1 (4)، صص 65-86].

  • Emerek, L., & Ørum, A. (1997). The conception of the bourgeois public sphere as a theoretical background for understanding the history of Danish public libraries. In N. W. Lund (Ed.), Nordic Yearbook of Library, Information, and Documentation Research (Vol. 1, pp. 27-57). Oslo, Norway: Novus.
  • Evjen, S. (2015). The image of an institution: politicians and the urban library project. Library & Information Science Research, 37 (1), 28-35.
  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy, Social Text, 25/26, 56-80.
  • Felicetti, A. (2016). Deliberative Democracy and Social Movements: Transition Initiatives in the Public Sphere, Rowman & Littlefield International, London.
  • Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Goldthorpe, J. D. (2007). Can Scotthish Public Libraries Claim They Are Socially Inclusive of All Minority Groups when Lesbian Fiction is still so Inaccessible? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 39 (4), 234 – 248.
  • Goulding, A. (2009). Engaging with community engagement: Public libraries and citizen involvement. New Library World. 110 (1/2), 37-51.
  • Greenhalgh, L., Landry, C., & Worpole, K. (1993). Borrowed time? The future of public libraries in the UK. Gloucestershire, UK: Comedia.
  • Habermas, J. (1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
  • Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Thomas Burger, cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press, Translation from the original German, published, 1962.
  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Habermas, J. (2004). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. (Jamal Mohammadi, Trans.). Tehran: Agah.(Original Work Publish 1989) ]In Persian[

[هابرماس، یورگن (1383). دگرگونی ساختاری حوزه عمومی: کاوشی در باب جامعه ی بورژوازی. (جمال محمدی، مترجم). تهران: آگاه].

  • Habermas, J. (2006). Public sphere. ) Javad Kargarazi, Trans.(. Public Law Studies Quarterly . 2: 42-47. ]In Persian[

[هابرماس، یورگن (1385). حوزه عمومی. ترجمه جواد کارگزاری. فصلنامه حقوق عمومی. 2، 42-47].

  • Hansson, J. (2011). Public libraries and the national minorities of Sweden – results of a national survey. New Library World, 112 (9/10), 406-415.
  • Hart, G. (2007). Social capital: A fresh vision for public librar­ies in South Africa? South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science 73(1), 14–24.
  • Holub, R. (1997). Jürgen Habermas: Criticism in the public sphere (Habermas' philosophical controversies with the Poppers, Gadamer, Luhmann, Lyotard, Derrida, and others). )Hossein Bashirieh, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-e-Ney. (Original Work Publish 1989) ]In Persian[

[هالوب، رابرت (1375). یورگن هابرماس: نقد در حوزه‌ عمومی (مجادلات فلسفی هابرماس با پوپری‌ها، گادامر، لومان، لیوتار، دریدا و دیگران). مترجم: حسین بشیریه. تهران: نشر نی].

  • Hvenegaard Rasmussen, C. and Jochumsen, H. (2000). Fremtidens rummelige bibliotek. Viden Om, 2, 4-7.
  • Hvenegaard Rasmussen, C. and Jochumsen, H. (2007). Problems and possibilities: the public library in the borderline between modernity and late modernity. The Library Quarterly, 77 (1), 45-59.
  • IFLA (2020). IFLA guidelines: Public library service (Pazouki, Fatemeh; Hassanzadeh, Maryam; Qasempour, Sakineh, Trans.). Tehran: Chapar.]In Persian[

[ایفلا (1399). رهنمودهای ایفلا: خدمت کتابخانه عمومی (پازوکی، فاطمه؛ حسن‌زاه، مریم؛ قاسم‌پور، سکینه؛ مترجمان). تهران: چاپار].

  • Jochumsen, H., Rasmussen, C. H., Skot-Hansen, D. (2012). The four spaces – a newmodel for the public library, New Library World, 113 (11/12), 586 - 597.
  • Kann-Christensen, N. (2011). National Strategies for Public Library Development: Danish and Swedish Models for Project Funding, Centre for Cultural Policy Studies, 14 (1/2), 33-50.
  • Klinenberg, E. (2018). Palaces for the People. How to Build a More Equal and United Society. London: The Bodley Head.
  • Koizumi, M., Larsen, H. (2019). Public libraries and democracy in the Nordic model. In Gašo, G., Ranogajec, M. G., Žilić, J., & Lundman, M. (Eds) Information and technology transforming lives: connection, interaction, innovation. Proceedings of the XXVII Bobcatsss Symposium, pp. 452-457, Osijek, Croatia, BOBCATSSS.
  • Kranich, N. (2005). Libraries & Democracy: The Cornerstones of Library. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
  • Larsen, H. (2020). Theorizing Public Libraries as Public Spheres in Library and Information Science. In: Sundqvist A., Berget G., Nolin J., Skjerdingstad K. (eds) Sustainable Digital Communities. iConference 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12051. Springer, Cham.
  • Leckie, G. J. & Buschman, J. E. (2007). Space, place, and libraries: an introduction”, in Buschman, J. E. & Leckie, G. J. (Eds), The Library as Place: History, Community, and Culture, Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT, pp. 3-25.
  • Leckie, G. J. & Hopkins, J. (2002). The public place of central libraries: findings from Toronto and Vancouver, Library Quarterly, 72 (3), 326-372.
  • McCabe, R. B (2001). Civic Librarianship: Renewing the Social Missions of the Public Library. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
  • McCook, K. d. l. P. (2003). Suppressing the commons: misconstrued patriotism vs psychology of liberation, Reference and User Services Quarterly, 43 (1), 14-17.
  • McCook, K. d. l. P. (2004). Introduction to Public Librarianship, Neal-Schuman, New York, NY.
  • McKenzie, K. (2010). The Future of the Public Library. INFO, 8, 1-23.
  • Melton, J. (2001). The Rise of the Enlightenment Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  • Morrison, H. (2010). The role of the research library in an emerging global public sphere, LIBER Annual Conference, Aarhus University, Denmark, June 29.
  • Newman, J. (2007). Re-mapping the public. Cultural Studies, 21 (6), 887-909.
  • Nowzari, H. (2002). Re-readingHabermas (Income to the Opinions, Thoughts, and Theories of Jürgen Habermas). Tehran: Nashr-e-Cheshmeh. (Original Work Publish 1929) ]In Persian[

[نوذری، حسینعلی (1381). بازخوانی هابرماس (درآمدی بر آراء، اندیشه‌ها و نظریه‌های یورگن هابرماس). تهران: نشر چشمه].

  • Oldenburg, R. (1989). The Great Good Place: Cafés, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. Paragon House, New York.
  • Pateman, J. & Vincent, J. (2010) Public Libraries and Social Justice. Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Richards, P. S., Wiegand, W. A., & Dalbello, M. (2015). A history of modern librarianship: Constructing the heritage of western cultures. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimit
  • Rothbauer, P. (2007). Locating the library as place among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer patrons”, in Buschman, J.E. and Leckie, G.J. (Eds), The Library as Place: History, Community, and Culture, Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT, pp. 101-115.
  • Schuhböck, H. P. (1983). Die gesellschaftliche funktion von bibliotheken in der bundesrepublik deutschland: zur neueren diskussion nach 1945 (The societal function of libraries in the Federal Republic of Germany: the recent discussion since 1945)”, Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis, 7 (3), 203-222.
  • Seyed Alavi, M. (1390). Public sphere in cyberspace: factors related to the formation of public domain on the Internet. PhD Thesis in Social Communication Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran. ]In Persian[

 [سیدعلوی، مسعود (1390). حوزه‌ عمومی در فضای مجازی: عوامل مرتبط با شکل‌گیری حوزه‌ عمومی در اینترنت. پایان‌نامه دکتری علوم ارتباطات اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران].

  • Sturges, P. (2005). Understanding cultures, and IFLA’s freedom of access to information and freedom of expression (FAIFE) core activity, Journal of Documentation, 61 (2), 296-305.
  • Thauer, W., & Vodosek, P. (1978). Geschichte der Öffentlichen Bücherei in Deutschland [History of the public library in Germany]. Wiesbaden, West Germany: Otto Harrassowitz.
  • Tuomaala, O., Järvelin, K. & Vakkari, P. (2014). Evolution of library and information science, 1965-2005: content analysis of journal articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65 (7), 1446-1462.
  • Vakkari, P., Aabø, S., Audunson, R., Huysmans, F., & Oomes, M. (2014). Perceived outcomes of public libraries in Finland, Norway and the Netherlands. Journal of Documentation, 70 (5), 927-944.
  • Van Krieken, R. (2016). Habermas & the Public Sphere. Australia: YouTube, Department of Sociology and Social Policy, The University of Sydney. Retrieve from:  https://youtu.be/1PzTyNe4tP4.
  • Varheim, A. (2008). Theoretical approaches on public libraries as places creating social capital”, Libraries without Borders: Navigating Towards Global Understanding, World Library and Information Congress: 74th IFLA General Conference and Council, The International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA), pp. 1-10.
  • Vestheim, G. (1997). Libraries as agents of the public sphere: Pragmatism contra social responsibility. In N. W. Lund (Ed.), Nordic Yearbook of Library, Information, and Documentation Research (Vol. 1, pp. 115-124). Oslo, Norway: Novus.
  • Vincent, J. (2009). Inclusion: Training to tackle social exclusion. In: Brine A (ed.) Handbook of Library Training Practice and Development. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 123–146.
  • Webster, F. (1995). Theories of the information society. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Widdersheim, M. M. (2015). Governance, Legitimation, Commons: A Public Sphere Framework and Research Agenda for the Public Library Sector, Libri, 65 (4), 237-245.
  • Widdersheim, M. M., Koizumi, M. (2016). Conceptual modelling of the public sphere in public libraries, Journal of Documentation, 72 (3), 591 – 610.
  • Widdersheim, M. M. & Koizumi, M. (2017). A communication system approach to the problem of public library legitimacy, Library & Information Science Research, 39 (1), 23-33.
  • Wiegand, W.A. (2003). To reposition a research agenda: what American studies can teach the LIS community about the library in the life of the user, The Library Quarterly, 73 (4), 369-382.
  • Wiegand, W. A. (2015). Part of Our Lives: A People’s History of the American Public Library. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Williamson, M. J. (1998). The public library and social inclusion: Information services to jobseekers. (PhD Thesis), University of Brighton, UK.
  • Williamson, M. J. (2000). Social exclusion and the public library: A Habermasian insight, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 32 (4), 178-186.
  • Zavaraqi, R. (2012). Investigating the role and position of public libraries in the development of entrepreneurial culture. Information and Communication Quarterly Book Review (Ketab-e Mah-e Kolliat), 15 (6): 94-101. ]In Persian[

[زوارقی، رسول (1391). بررسی نقش و جایگاه کتابخانه‌های عمومی در توسعه فرهنگ کارآفرینی. فصلنامه نقد کتاب اطلاع‌رسانی و ارتباطات (کتاب ماه کلیات)، 15 (6)، 94-101].

 

 

 

 

Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 26 March 2021
  • Revise Date: 05 June 2021
  • Accept Date: 25 June 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics