Criterions of Evaluating Scientific Publications Nationally and Internationally: Viewpoints of Editors and dministrators of Persian Scientific Publications Published in the Field of Humanities

Document Type : Research ŮŽ Article

Authors

1 M.A. of Library and Information Science, Alzahra University; Tehran, I.R. Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Library and Information Science, Alzahra University, Tehran, I.R. Iran

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is recognizing and introducing the criterions of evaluating
scientific publications well-known nationally and internationally, and representing an
integrated list of these criterions for evaluating Persian scientific publications.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This is a quantitative research using Library, survey and
Delphi study methods. Data gathering tools are a checklist (researcher-made and consisting
of seventy nine criterions) and a questionnaire (consisting seventy nine questions in
accordance with the seventy nine criterions of the mentioned checklist).
Findings: After recognizing the criterions, the significance of each criterion is evaluated by
the experts of scientific publications in the fields of librarianship and information sciences.
The findings of this research and analysis of the viewpoints of editors and administrators
of this field show that 71 of the total 79 criterions possess less than %5 of majority approval
in a meaningful way.
Conclusion: The present research represents an integrated list consisting of 79 criterions
for evaluating scientific publications, which could be helpful for any institution as a credited
evaluating tool for choosing, evaluating and indicating the credibility of scientific publications.

Keywords


CAPTCHA Image