Identifying the Factors Influencing the Serendipitous Acquisition of Information: A Systematic Review

Document Type : Research َ Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, of Ahvaz, Iran

4 Department of Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: Information behavior includes intentional and unintentional behaviors. One of the unintentional information behaviors is the serendipitous acquisition of information. This type of behavior, which complements the inquiry, has an important role in the learning behaviors and everyday information acquisition by researchers. The occurrence of this type of behavior is influenced by the factors that the present study was conducted to identify.
Method: This systematic review employs the eight-step process of the Okoli review method. The research population includes English articles indexed in the Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and Persian articles indexed in the Islamic World Science Citation Database (ISC), Scientific Information Database (SID), MagIran, Normagz, and Ensani. After applying the search strategy, the retrieved articles were imported to the EndNote 20 software and duplicate articles were removed. Then, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 40 related articles were studied in order to identify the factors affecting serendipitous acquisition of information.
Results The history of the study of the serendipitous acquisition of information goes back more than three decades. The serendipitous acquisition of information is influenced by internal factors, external factors, and environmental characteristics. Internal factors are influenced by person's psychological and personality characteristics and can be created or managed by the person her/himself. Internal factors include information need, topical knowledge, Sagacity, curiosity, sensitivity, conscientiousness, extroversion, emotions, self-confidence, information literacy, enjoyment of the search process, and education. External factors such as time, status, and place are separate from psychological and personality characteristics of the person and can facilitate serendipity. Some environmental characteristics enables exploration and discovery, ease of access, connectivity, stimulus-richness, enables connections, trigger rich, highlights triggers, variety, contrasts, incompleteness, multi-reachability, and slowability cultivate serendipity. Despite the importance of serendipity in information seeking, it has not attracted the attention of Iranian researchers
Conclusion: Recent advances in information technology and the emergence of Web2 have created new horizons in the ways of obtaining information and have caused an increase in unintentional acquisition of information. Therefore, the way that such behavior occurs, and its effects and results should be investigated. Recognition and control of factors affecting successful acquisition of information could help the search process. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

داورپناه، محمدرضا (۱۳۸۲). جستجوی اطلاعات علمی و پژوهشی در منابع چاپی و الکترونیکی. تهران: چاپار، دبیزش.
هراتی، هادی، نوشین‌فرد، فاطمه، اسفندیاری مقدم، علیرضا، باب‌الحوائجی، فهیمه، حریری، نجلا (۱۳۹۷). تأثیر عوامل فرهنگی و اجتماعی بر رفتار برنامه‌ریزی‌نشده کاربران کتابخانه‌های دانشگاهی. تعامل اطلاعات انسانی، ۵(۲): ۱-۱۴.
References
Agarwal, N. K. (2015). Towards a definition of serendipity in information behaviour. Information Research. 20(3). 675. Availiable at: http://InformationR.net/ir/20- 3/pape5674.html
Åkerström, M. )2013(. Curiosity and Serendipity in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology Review IX. 9(2), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.09.2.02.
André, P. (2009). schraefel, mc Teevan, J. and Dumais, ST (2009). Discovery is never by chance: designing for (un) serendipity. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition (pp. 305-314).
Anderson, T. D. (2013). The 4Ps of Innovation Culture: Conceptions of Creatively Engaging with Information. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 18(3), n3.‏ available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/18-3/colis/paperC28.html (accessed May 20, 2020).
Bandura, A. (1982). The psychology of chance encounters and life paths. American Psychologist, 37(7), 747-755. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.7.747.
Basic, J., & Erdelez, S. (2015). The role of risky behaviors and health education in college students’ health information acquisition on the internet. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 1-10.‏ http://doi.org.10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010049.
Bates, M. J. (1989). The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review. 13, 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024320
Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and Exploration: Animals spend much of their time seeking stimuli whose significance raises problems for psychology. Science, 153(3731), 25-33.‏ http://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.153.3731.25
Bigdeli, Z., & Afifian, F. (2018). Accidental iscovery of Information in Using of Social Networks and Online Communication, A Case Study: Shiraz University Students. Iranian Journal of Information processing and Management, 33(2), 687-706.‏ http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article-1-3344-fa.html. [In Persian]
Bird-Meyer, M., Erdelez, S., & Bossaller, J. (2019). The role of serendipity in the story ideation process of print media journalists. Journal of Documentation, 75(5), 995-1012. http://doi.org/10.1108/jd-11-2018-0186.
Bogers, T., & Björneborn, L. (2013. February). Micro-serendipity: meaningful coincidences in everyday life shared on Twitter. Fort Worth in iConference (pp. 196-208). http://doi.org/10.9776/13175.
Bjorneborn, L. (2008). Serendipity dimensions and users' information behaviour in the physical library interface. Information Research-an International Electronic Journal. 13(4). Retrieved from :// WOS:000262139300018.
Bjorneborn, L. (2017). Three key affordances for serendipity Toward a framework connecting environmental and personal factors in serendipitous encounters. Journal of Documentation, 73(5), 1053-1081. http://doi.org/10.1108/jd-07-2016-0097.
Bruce, H. (2005). Personal, anticipated information need. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 10(3), n3.‏
Buchanan, S. A., Bossaller, S., & Erdelez, S. (2018). Information encountering by an art historian: A methodological case study. Information Science and Technology, 55(1), 762-764. http://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2018.14505501106.
Case, D. O., & Given, L. M. (2016). Looking for information: a survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior, 4th edition. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91(2), 259. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23778
Chang, P.-C., & Quiroga, L. (2010). Using Wikipedia’s content for cross-website page recommendations that consider serendipity. In international technologies and applications of artificial intelligence conference (pp. 293-298). http://doi.org/10.1109/TAAI.2010.55
Conrad, L. Y., & Moeller, P. D. (2017). Search, Serendipity, and the Researcher Experience. Serials Librarian, 72(1-4), 190-193. http://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2017.1292744.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Its Relevance to Personality Disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343–359. http://doi:10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343
Dantonio, L., Makri, S., & Blandford, A. (2012). Coming across academic social media content serendipitously. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 49(1). http://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901002.
Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., Sedooka, A., & Steffen, G. (2014). Interdisciplinary research boosted by serendipity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1),1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.873653.
Davrpanah, M. R. (2012). Scientific information seeking in printed and electronic resources. Tehran: Chapar, Dabizesh. [In Persian] 
Dew, N. (2009). Serendipity in entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 30(7), 735-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104815.
Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., ... Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058867.
Erdelez, S. (1995). Information encountering: An exploration beyond information seeking. Syracuse University.‏
Erdelez, S. (2004). Investigation of information encountering in the controlled research environment. Information Processing and Management, 40(6), 1013-1025. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2004.02.
Erdelez, S., Toms, E. G., Rioux, K., & Miwa, M. (2002). Opportunistic acquisition of information: The new frontier for information user studies. In Proceedings of Asist Annual Meeting, l(39), 521-522. Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450390194.
Erdelez, S., Heinström, J., Makri, S., Björneborn, L., Beheshti, J., Toms, E., & Agarwal, N. K. (2016). Research perspectives on serendipity and information encountering. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T), 53, 1–5. http://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301011. 53.
Erdelez, S., & Makri, S. (2020). Information encountering re-encountered: A conceptual re-examination of serendipity in the context of information acquisition. Journal of Documentation, 76(3), 731-751. http://doi.org.10.1108/JD-08-2019-0151.
Fan, X. Y., & Niu, X. (2018). Implementing and Evaluating Serendipity in Delivering Personalized Health Information. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 9(2). http://doi.org/10.1145/3205849.
Fine, G. A., & Deegan, J. G. (1996). Three principles of Serendip: insight, chance, and discovery in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(4), 434–447. http://doi:10.1080/0951839960090405
Foster, A., & Ford, N. (2003). Serendipity and information seeking: An empirical study. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 321-340. http://doi.org/10.1108/00220410310472518.
Friedel, R. (2001). Serendipity is no accident. The Kenyon Review, 23(2): 36–46.
Gopnik, A. (2011). Why preschool shouldn’t be like school. Slate, November 16, available at: www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2011/03/why_preschool_shouldnt_be_like_school.html
Handelsman, J. (2015). The value of basic research, The White House, June 2. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2015/06/02/value-basic-research.
Harati, H., Nooshinfard, F., Isfandyari-Moghaddam, A., Babalhavaeji, F., & Hariri, N. (2018). Measuring the Factors Affecting the Unplanned Behavior of Users to Use Academic Libraries Resources and Services. Human Information Interaction, 5(2), 1-14.‏ [In Persian]
Heinström, J. (2006). Psychological factors behind incidental information acquisition. Library and Information Science Research, 28(4), 579-594. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2006.03.022.
Heinstrom, J., & Sormunen, E. (2001). Serendipity as chaos or discovery - exploring the role of personality and sense of coherence. Information Research-an International Electronic Journal, 25(4). http://doi.org/10.47989/irisic2001.
Jiang, T., Liu, F., & Chi, Y. (2015). Online information encountering: modeling the process and influencing factors. Journal of Documentation, 71(6), 1135-1157. http://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2014-0100.
Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation. New York: Penguin Group. https://doi.org/10.1037/e609342010-001.
Kefalidou, G., & Sharples, S. (2016). Encouraging serendipity in research: Designing technologies to support connection-making. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 89, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.01.003.
Knudsen, G. H., & Lemmergaard, J. (2014). Strategic serendipity: How one organization planned for and took advantage of unexpected communicative opportunities. Culture and Organization, 20(5), 392-409.‏ http://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2014.948440.
Lawley, J., & Tompkins, P. (2008). Maximising serendipity: the art of recognising and fostering potential. Paper presented at the Developing Group. http://www.academia.edu/1836363/Maximising_Serendipity_The_art_of_recognising_and_fostering_potential (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6Z0D8frM2)
Loewenstein, G. (1994). The Psychology of Curiosity: A Review and Reinterpretation. Psychological bulletin, 116 (1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75.
Lu, Q., Chen, T., Zhang, W., Yang, D., & Yu, Y. (2012). Serendipitous personalized ranking for top-n recommendation. In 2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (Vol. 1, pp. 258-265). IEEE. http://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2012.135.41.
Lu, H. P., & Cheng, Y. H. (2020). Sustainability in Online Video Hosting Services: The Effects of Serendipity and Flow Experience on Prolonged Usage Time. Sustainability, 12(3), 1271. http://doi.org/10.3390/su12031271.
Lutz, C., Hoffmann, C. P., & Meckel, M. (2017). Online Serendipity: A Contextual Differentiation of Antecedents and Outcomes. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(7), 1698-1710. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23771.
Makri, S., & Blandford, A. (2012). Coming across information serendipitously – Part 1: A process model. Journal of Documentation, 68(5), 684-705. http://doi.org/10.1108/00220411211256030.
Makri, S., Blandford, A., Woods, M., Sharples, S., & Maxwell, D. (2014). “Making my own luck”: Serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(11), 2179-2194. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23200.
Martin, K., & Quan-Haase, A. (2016). The role of agency in historians’ experiences of serendipity in physical and digital information environments. Journal of Documentation, 72(6), 1008-1026. http://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2015-0144.
Merton, R.K., & Barber, E.G. (2004). The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Historical Semantics and the Sociology of Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
McBirnie, A. (2008). Seeking serendipity: the paradox of control. Aslib Proceedings, 60(6), 600-618. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530810924294.
McCay-Peet, L., & Toms, E. (2011). Measuring the dimensions of serendipity in digital environments. Information Research, 16(3), 483. Available from http://InformationR.net/ir/16-3/paper483.html.
McCay-Peet, L., & Toms, E. G. (2015). Investigating serendipity: How it unfolds and what may influence it. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1463-1476. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23273.
McKay, D., Chang, S., Smith, W., & Buchanan, G. (2019). The Things We Talk About When We Talk About Browsing: An Empirical Typology of Library Browsing Behavior. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(12), 1383-1394. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24200.
Mitchelstein, E., Boczkowski, P. J., Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K., Hayashi, K., Villi, M., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2020). Incidentality on a continuum: A comparative conceptualization of incidental news consumption. Journalism, 21(8), 1136-1153. http://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915355.
Noseworthy, T. J., Di Muro, F., & Murray, K. B. (2014). The role of arousal in congruity-based product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1108-1126.‏
Nutefall, J. E., & Ryder, P. M. (2010). The Serendipitous Research Process. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(3), 228-234. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.03.005.
Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 43.‏ Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol37/iss1/43.
O'Hare, S., & Erdelez, S. (2017). Legal information acquisition by the public: The role of personal and environmental factors. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 298-307. http://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401033.
O'reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0-Design Pattern and Business Models for the Next Generation Software. http://www. oreillynet. com/1pt/a/6228.‏ from http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
Pálsdóttir, A. (2011). Opportunistic discovery of information by elderly Icelanders and their relatives. Information Research, 16(3). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-80053042729&partnerID=40&md5=97db20c4e070c818e3a9495e220bd6ff.
Race, T. M. (2012). Resource Discovery Tools: Supporting Serendipity Planning and mplementing Resource Discovery Tools in Academic Libraries. DLTS Faculty Publications, Paper 22. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/dlts_fac_pub/22/.
Race, T. M., & Makri, S. (Eds.). (2016). Accidental information discovery: Cultivating serendipity in the digital age. Elsevier.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-750-7.00001-7.
Reviglio, U. (2019). Serendipity as an emerging design principle of the infosphere: challenges and opportunities. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(2), 151-166. http://doi:10.1007/s10676-018-9496-y.
Ross, C.S. (1999). Finding without seeking: the information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure. Information Processing and Management, 35(6): 783-799. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00026-6.
Rubin, V. L., Burkell, J., & Quan-Haase, A. (2011). Facets of serendipity in everyday chance
encounters: a grounded theory approach to blog analysis. Information Research,
16(3). http://informationr.net/ir/16-3/paper488.html.
Stewart, K. N., & Basic, J. (2014). Information encountering and management in information literacy instruction of undergraduate, students. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 74-79. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.10.007.
Sun, X., Sharples, S., & Makri, S. (2011). A user-centred mobile diary study approach to understanding serendipity in information research. Information Research, 16(3) paper 492. Available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/16-3/paper492.html.
Tabatabai, D., & Shore, B. M. (2005). How experts and novices search the Web. Library and Information Science Research, 27(2), 222-248. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2005.01.005.
Ullah, A., & Ameen, K. (2018).Account of methodologies and methods applied in LIS research: A systematic review. Library and Information Science Research, 40(1), 53- 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2018.03.002.
Weeks, B. E., Lane, D. S., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. S., & Kwak, N. (2017). Incidental Exposure, Selective Exposure, and Political Information Sharing: Integrating Online Exposure Patterns and Expression on Social Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(6), 363-379. http://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12199.
Williamson, K. (1998). Discovered by chance: The role of incidental information acquisition in an ecological model of information use. Library and Information Science Research, 20(1), 23-40. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(98)90004-4.
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Human Information Behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49– 55. https://doi.org/10.28945/576.
Workman, T. E., Fiszman, M., & Rindflesch, T. C. (2014). Framing serendipitous information-seeking behavior for facilitating literature-based discovery: A proposed model. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(3), 501-512. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22999.
Yadamsuren, B., & Erdelez, S. (2010). Incidental exposure to online news. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 47. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701237.
Zhou, X., Sun, X., Wang, Q., & Sharples, S. (2018). A context-based study of serendipity in information research among Chinese scholars. Journal of Documentation, 74(3), 526-551. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-05-2017-0079.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 25 May 2022
  • Revise Date: 08 August 2022
  • Accept Date: 09 August 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics