Misleading Metrics and Iranian Journals

Document Type : Research َ Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate, Science and Technology Policy, Iran University of Science and Technology; Expert of Sicentometrics Office, Iran University of Science and Technology

2 MA, Knowledge and Information Science, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the characteristics of misleading metrics and identify the extent to which Iranian journals use such indicators.
Methodology: Charctrisitcs were harvested form th eliterature. Then, 410 Iranian journals using such metrics were identified from the misleading metrics websites. Data analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel.
Findings: Sudden disappearance from the web, large number of indexed journals, ambiguous and non-scientific methodologies, lack of accurate contact information, failure to notify about the scientific and administarive staff, charging journals for the calculation of metrics and conducting the evaluation in a short period of time were common. The name and information of 410 Iranian journals were listed in the website of 23 misleading metrics, 49 accredited by The Iranian Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (MSRT) and 101 titles accredited by The Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MHME) mentioned at-least one misleading metric in their websites. Out of medical science journals 56% are affiliated with the medical science universities and institutions.
Conclusion: Utilizing misleading metrics negatively affect the reputation of scientific journals. That put them at the rist to be listed as as predatory journals. Editorial boards are advised to avoid being indexed in misleading metrics and focus on reputable information and citation databases.

Keywords

References

اصنافی، امیررضا؛ پورحسین، راضیه؛ و امیدی‌نیا، مریم (1396). میزان همکاری پژوهشگران ایرانی در نشریات علمی نامعتبر. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، 28 (3)، 93–105.
جمالی مهموئی، حمیدرضا؛ جشیره‌نژادی، فرانگیس؛ و علیمحمدی، داریوش (1396). میزان مشارکت دانشگاهیان ایران در مجله‌های ناشران متقلب در سال 2015. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، 28 (3)، 81–92.
فرجی‌پور لاکه، اعظم (1393). شناسایی ویژگی‌های مشترک مجله‌های نامعتبر و تحلیل وضعیت انتشار مقالات ایرانی در آن‌ها. تحقیقات کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی دانشگاهی، 49 (3)، 339-353.
Asadi, A., Rahbar, N., Rezvani, M. J., & Asadi, F. (2017). Fake / Bogus Conferences : Their Features and Some Subtle Ways to Differentiate Them from Real Ones. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–6. Retrieved January 25, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9906-2
Beall, J. (2013). Medical publishing triage–chronicling predatory open access publishers. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 2 (2), 47–49.
Beall, J. (2014). Corrupt and Questionable Practices in the Scholarly Publishing Industry. Editorial Office News, 7 (10), 10-13
Dadkhah, M., & Borchardt, G. (2016). Hijacked journals: an emerging challenge for scholarly publishing. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 36 (6), 739–741.
Dadkhah, M., Borchardt, G., Lagzian, M., & Bianciardi, G. (2017). Academic Journals Plagued by Bogus Impact Factors. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33 (2), 183–187.
Dadkhah, M., Maliszewski, T., Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016). Hijacked journals, hijacked web-sites, journal phishing, misleading metrics, and predatory publishing: actual and potential threats to academic integrity and publishing ethics. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 12 (3), 353–362.
Dadkhah, M., Sutikno T., Jazi M. D., Stiawan D. (2015). An introduction to journal phishings and their detection approach. Telkomnika, 13, 373–80
Erfanmanesh, M., & Pourhossein, R. (2017). Publishing in Predatory Open Access Journals: a Case of Iran. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33, 433–444. Retrieved January 25, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-017-9547-y
Gutierrez, F. R. S., Beall, J., & Forero, D. A. (2015). Spurious alternative impact factors: The scale of the problem from an academic perspective. BioEssays, 37 (5), 474–476.
Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66 (7), 1406-1417.
Jalalian, M. (2015). The story of fake impact factor companies and how we detected them. Electronic Physician, 7 (2), 1069–72.
Jalalian, M., & Dadkhah, M. (2015). The full story of 90 hijacked journals from August 2011 to June 2015. Geographica Pannonica, 19 (2), 73–87.
Jalalian, M., Mahboobi, H. (2013). New corruption detected: Bogus impact factors compiled by fake organizations. The New York Times, 5 (3), 685–686.
Jalalian, M., & Mahboobi, H. (2014). Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: Is there a need to re-think how to assess the quality of academic research?Walailak Journal of Science & Technology, 11 (5), 389-394.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 May 2019
  • Revise Date: 02 August 2019
  • Accept Date: 04 August 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics