زمان‌زاده، و.؛ و غفوری‌فرد، م. (1395). کنکاشی بر چالش اخلاقی سوءرفتار علمی در مقالات علوم پزشکی: مصداق‌ها، علل و راهکارهای پیشگیری از آن. آموزش و اخلاق در پرستاری، 5 (1)، 51–55. بازیابی بازیابی 15 دی 1395، ازhttp://ethic.jums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=372&sid=1&slc_lang=fa
شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی(1389). سند نقشه جامع علمی کشور. تهران: شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی.
عباسیان، زهره؛ و رجب‌زاده‌عصارها، امیرحسین (1395). سلب اعتبار مقالات منتشرشده در نشریات. بازیابی 15 دی 1395، از http://www.samimnoor.ir/view/fa/ArticleView?itemId=47
مرادی، نسرین (1395). اندازه گروههای پژوهشی جامعه علمی ایران و تأثیر آن بر استنادها. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
Al-Marzouki, S., Roberts, I., Marshall, T., & Evans, S. (2005). The effect of scientific misconduct on the results of clinical trials: a delphi survey. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 26 (3), 331–337. Retrieved December 12, 2016, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2005.01.011
Callaway, E.)2016, November(. Publisher pulls 58 articles by iranian scientists over authorship manipulation. Nature news. Retrieve December 12, 2016, from http://www.nature.com/news/publisher-pulls-58-articles-by-iranian-scientists-over-authorship-manipulation-1.20916
Clark, T. D., Binning, S. A., Raby, G. D., Speers-Roesch, B., Sundin, J., Jutfelt, F., & Roche, D. G. (2016). Scientific misconduct: the elephant in the lab. A Response to Parker et al. Trends In Ecology & Evolution, 31 (12), 899–900.
Coghlan, A. (2011, March 28). Iran is top of the world in science growth. New Scientist, 28. Retrieved January 21, 2018, from https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20291-iran-is-top-of-the-world-in-science-growth/
Cokol, M., Iossifov, I., Rodriguez‐Esteban, R., & Rzhetsky, A.) 2007(. How many scientific papers should be retracted?. EMBO reports, 8 (5), 422-423.
Cokol, M., Ozbay, F., & Rodriguez‐Esteban, R. )2008(. Retraction rates are on the rise. EMBO reports, 9 (1), 2-2.
Enago Academy. (2016). 10 Types of scientific misconduct. Retrieved December 12, 2016, from https://www.enago.com/academy/10-types-of-scientific-misconduct/
Fang, F. C., Casadevall, A., & Morrison, R. P. )2011(. Retracted science and the retraction index. American society for microbiology, 79 (10), 3855-3859.
Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109 (42), 17028–17033.
Grieneisen, M. L., & Zhang, M. )2012(. A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLoS ONE, 7 (10). Retrieved December 12, 2016, from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0044118
Haug, CJ. (2015). Peer-review fraud—hacking the scientific publication process. N Engl J Med., 373, 2393-2395. Doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1512330
Karabag, F., & Berggren, Ch.)2012(. Retraction, dishonesty and plagiarism: Analysis of a crucial issue for academic publishing, and the inadequate responses from leading journals in economics and management disciplines. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 2 (3), 172-183.
Kharabaf, S., & Abdollahi, M. (2012). Science growth in Iran over the past 35 years. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 17 (3), 275. Retrieved January 21, 2018, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3527047/
McCook, A. )2017(. Does social psychology really have a retraction problem?. Retraction Watch. Retrieved January 11, 2017, from http://retractionwatch.com/2017/01/11/social-psychology-really-retraction-problem/
Mohammadhassanzadeh H., Beigzadeh A., & Nazarieh M.)2015(. A road to ethics: a new experience of retraction. Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma, 2 (1), 1-2.
Moylan, E. C., Kowalczuk, M. K. (2016). Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central. BMJ Open, 6 (11). Retrieved January 11, 2017, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012047.
Sade, R. M., Canver, C., D'Amico, T., Ellis, J., Fenton, K., Freeman, R., & Kohman, L. (2016). Sanctions for research misconduct in cardiothoracic surgery journals. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 152 (3), 661-663.
Sarwar, U., & Nicolaou, M. )2012(. Fraud and deceit in medical research. Medical science, 97 (11), 1077-1079.
Singh, H. P., Mahendra, A., Yadav, B., Singh, H., Arora, N., & Arora, M. )2014(. A comprehensive analysis of articles retracted between 2004 and 2013 from biomedical literature–a call for reforms. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine, 4 (3), 136-139.
Sugawara, Y., Tanimoto, T., Miyagawa, S., Murakami, M., Tsuya, A., Tanaka, A., & Narimatsu, H. (2017). Scientific misconduct and social media: Role of twitter in the stimulus triggered acquisition of pluripotency cells scandal. Journal of medical Internet research, 19 (2). Retrieved April 5, 2017 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5350454/
Tijdink, J. K., Verbeke, R., & Smulders, Y. M. (2014). Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9 (5), 64-71.
Wager, E., Barbour, V., Steven, Y., & Kleinert, S. (2009). COPE's retraction guidelines. The Lancet, 374 (9705), 1876-1877.
Wang, J., Ku, J., Alotaibi, N. M., & Rutka, J. T. (2017). Retraction of neurosurgical publications: a systematic review. World Neurosurgery. Retrieved December 12, 2016, from http://www.worldneurosurgery.org/article/S1878-8750(17)30509-0/pdf
World Heritage Encyclopedia (2017). Otline of academic decepline. Retrieved December 12, 2016, from http://www.worldlibrary.org/articles/eng/outline_of_academic_disciplines
)
Send comment about this article