توکلی‌زاده راوری، محمد (1394). مدل دو مرحله‌ای شکاف- گلچین برای نمایه‌سازی خودکار متون فارسی. تحقیقات اطلاع‌رسانی و کتابخانه‌های عمومی 21 (80)، 13-40.
توکلی‌زاده‌راوری، محمد (1393). راور ماتریس: نرم افزار ایجاد ماتریس هم‌رخدادی (نسخه رایگان دوم) [نرم‌افزار رایانه]. یزد: دانشگاه یزد.
Abbas, A.; Zhang, L., & Khan, S. U. (2014). A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 30 (1), 3-13.
Assefa, S. G., & Rorissa, A. (2013). A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64 (12), 2513-2536.
Blackman, M. (1995). Provision of patent information: a national patent office perspective. World Patent Information, 17 (2), 115-123.
Bredillet, C. N. (2006)
The Future of Project Management: Mapping the dynamics of Project Management Field in Action. In Cleland, David I. & Gareis, Roland (Eds.)
Global project management handbook: planning, organizing and controlling International Projects, Second Edition: Planning, Organizing, and Controlling International Projects. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Constantine, L. S. (2014). Understanding the linkages in organizational and human relations: a review of social network analysis. The Qualitative Report, 19 (1), 1-22.
Frietsch, R., Neuhäusler, P., & Rothengatter, O. (2011). Patent applications-structures, trends and recent developments. Berlin: Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI. Retrieved 24 Sept. 2014, from http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-wAssets/docs/p/de/efi-studien/2016_StuDIS_04.pdf
He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library trends, 48 (1), 133-59.
Kumar, S., & Jan, J. M. (2012). Discovering knowledge landscapes: An epistemic analysis of business and management field in malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 1027-1032.
Lee, C., & Park, Y. (2009). Monitoring the evolutionary patterns of technological advances based on the dynamic patent lattice: A modified formal concept analysis approach. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Electronic Business Macau, Nov. 30 - Dec. 4, retrieved 20 Feb. 2015, from http://www.calpoly.edu/~eli/iceb/ICEB2009
Mane, K. K., & Börner, K. (2004). Mapping topics and topic bursts in PNAS. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 101(Suppl. 1), 5287-5290.
Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15 (1), 85-109.
Swanson, D. R., & Smalheiser, N. R. (1999). Implicit text linkages between Medline records: Using arrow smith as an aid to scientific discovery. Library Trends, 48 (1), 48-59.
Taduri, S. (2010). Application of patent networks to information retrieval: A preliminary study. Retrieved October 5, 2015, from: http://snap.stanford.edu/class/cs224w-2010/proj2010/20_final_report.pdf
Wang, X., & Inaba, M. (2009). Analyzing structures and evolution of digital humanities based on correspondence analysis and co-word analysis. Art research, 9, 123-134.
Wang, X.; Mohanty, N., & McCallum, A. (2006). Group and topic discovery from relations and their attributes. Retrieved 16 Aug. 2014, from https://people.cs.umass.edu/~mccallum/papers/gt-bookch07.pdf
)
ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله