Organizing Cultural Heritage Information: Previous Developments and Future Perspective

Balíková, M., Kunt, M., Šubová, J., & Andrejčíková, N. (2015). Facilitating access to cultural heritage content in Czechia INTERMI project. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://www.interpi.cz/download/INTERPI-monografie-eng.pdf
Binding, C. (2010). Implementing archaeological time periods using CIDOC CRM and SKOS. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6088 LNCS, (pp. 273–287). Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13486-9_19
Binding, C., May, K., & Tudhope, D. (2008). Semantic interoperability in archaeological datasets: Data mapping and extraction via the CIDOC CRM. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5173 LNCS, (pp. 280–290). Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87599-4_30
Bountouri, L., & Gergatsoulis, M. (2011). The Semantic Mapping of Archival Metadata to the CIDOC CRM Ontology. Journal of Archival Organization, 9 (3-4), 174–207. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2011.650124
Cane, P., & Conagham, J. (2009). The New Oxford Campanion to Law. In I. Ruthven & G. G. Chowdhury (Eds.), Cultural Heritage Information: Access and management. Retrieved December 28, 2017, from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ubkoeln/reader.action?docID=2073248&ppg=19
Carrasco, L., Borsetti, S. A., & Vidotti, G. (2015). Dublin Core and CIDOC CRM Harmonization. In International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/download/3779/1969
Chen, S. J., Zeng, M. L., & Chen, H. H. (2015). Alignment of conceptual structures in controlled vocabularies in the domain of Chinese art: a discussion of issues and patterns. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 17 (1), 23–38. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-015-0163-1
Damova, M., & Dannells, D. (2011). Reason-able view of linked data for cultural heritage. Third International Conference on Software, Services and Semantic Technologies S3t 2011, 101, 17–24. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from https://ontotext.com/documents/publications/2011/S3T-MuseumreasonableView_v7_cameraReady-30Jun.pdf
Doerr, M. (2000). Mapping of the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set to the CIDOC CRM. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/dc_to_crm_mapping.pdf
Doerr, M. (2003). The CIDOC CRM – an Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of Metadata. AI Magazine, 24 (3), 75-92. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from https://www.aaai.org/ojs/index.php/aimagazine/article/view/1720/1618

Eide, Ø., & Holmen, J. (2006). Reading gray literature as texts. Semantic Mark-up of Museum Acquisition Catalogues. In Proceeding of CIDOC 2006. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://www.edd.uio.no/artiklar/teknikk_informatikk/CIDOC2006/EIDE_HOLMEN_Reading_Gray_Literature.pdf
European Commission (2011). Commision Recommndation of 27 October 2011 on the Digitisation and Online Accessibility of Cultural Material and Digital Preservation. Retrieved December 28, 2017 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32011H0711&from=EN
FORTH & collaborators. (2015). CRMarchaeo: The Excavation Model: an Extension of CIDOC CRM to support the archaeological excavation process. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://cidoc-crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_sig/CRMarchaeo_v1.3.pdf
Hennicke, S. (2013). Representation of archival user needs using CIDOC CRM. In CRMEX 2013: Practical Experiences with CIDOC CRM and Its Extensions. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1117/paper5.pdf
Hiebel, G., Hanke, K., & Hayek, I. (2010). Methodology for CIDOC CRM based data integration with spatial data. In CAA’2010 Fusion of Cultures. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from https://www.uibk.ac.at/himat/publications/publications-2010/hiebel_hanke_hayek_caa_2010.pdf
ICOM/CIDOC, Documentation Standards Group, & CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. (2011). Definition of the CIDOC conceptual reference model. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_version_5.0.4.pdf
ICOM/CIDOC, Documentation Standards Group, & CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. (2017). In 38th CIDOC CRM and 31st FRBR CRM Agenda. Retrieved Jan. 28, 2018, from http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Meeting/38th-cidoc-crm-and-31st-frbr-crm
ICOM/CIDOC, Documentation Standards Group, & CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group. (2018). In 40th CIDOC CRM and 33rd FRBR CRM Agenda. Retrieved Jan. 28, 2018, from http://www.cidoc-crm.org/Meeting/40th-cidoc-crm-and-33rd-frbr-crm
Jannaschk, K., Rathje, C. A., Thalheim, B., & Forster, F. (2011). A generic database schema for CIDOC-CRM data management. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, (pp127–136). Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-789/paper13.pdf
Jordal, E., Holmen, J., Olsen, S. A., & Ore, C. (2004). From XML-tagged acquisition catalogues to an event-based relational database. In Proceedings of Computer Applications in Archaeology: Prato, Italy, 13 - 17 April. Retrieved September 18, 2017, from http://proceedings.caaconference.org/files/2004/12_Jordal_et_al_CAA_2004.pdf
Lin, C. H., Hong, J. S., & Doerr, M. (2008). Issues in an inference platform for generating deductive knowledge: a case study in cultural heritage digital libraries using the CIDOC CRM. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 8 (2), 115–132. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-008-0034-0
Mazurek, C., Sielski, K., Stroiński, M., Walkowska, J., Werla, M., & Weglarz, J. (2012). Transforming a flat metadata schema to a semantic web ontology: the polish digital libraries federation and CIDOC CRM case study. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 390, 153–177. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24809-2_10
Mazurek, C., Sielski, K., Walkowska, J., & Werla, M. (2012a). Applicability of Cidoc Crm in digital libraries. CIDOC Newsletter, 14–20. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://new.cidoc-crm.org/sites/default/files/Justyna_Walkowska_Paper_01.pdf
Mazurek, C., Sielski, K., Walkowska, J., & Werla, M. (2012b). From MARC21 and Dublin Core, through CIDOC CRM: First tenuous steps towards representing library data in FRBRoo. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://network.icom.museum/fileadmin/user_upload/minisites/cidoc/ConferencePapers/2012/mazurek.pdf
Mouromtsev D., Haase P., Cherny E., Pavlov D., Andreev A., & Spiridonova A. (2015). Towards the Russian linked culture cloud: Data enrichment and publishing. In F. Gandon, M. Sabou, H. Sack, C. d’Amato, P. Cudré-Mauroux, & A. Zimmermann (Eds.). The Semantic Web. Latest Advances and New Domains: 12th European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2015. Cham, NY: Springer.
Niccolucci, F., & Hermon, S. (2016). Representing gazetteers and period thesauri in four-dimensional space–time. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 17 (1), 63–69. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-015-0159-x
Ntousias, A., Gioldasis, N., Tsinaraki, C., & Christodoulakis, S. (2008). Rich metadata and context capturing through CIDOC/CRM and MPEG-7 interoperability. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Content-Based Image and Video Retrieval, (pp. 151–160). Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://doi.org/http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1386352.1386377
Nuessli, M., & Kaplan, F. (2014, 7-12 July). Encoding metaknowledge for historical databases. Paper presented at Digital Humanities Conference. Lausanne, Switzerland. Retrieved September 18, 2017, from https://dh2014.org/program/abstracts/
Nussbaumer, P., & Haslhofer, B. (2007). CIDOC CRM in action – experiences and challenges. Transformation, 4675, 2007–2007. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74851-9_61
Report, T. (2010). Towards model implementation guidelines for the CIDOC conceptual reference model. Archaeology. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://eprints.cs.univie.ac.at/58/
Riva, P., Le Boeuf, P., & Žumer, M. (2016). FRBR-Library reference model. Retrieved Jan. 28, 2018, from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/frbr-lrm_20160225.pdf
Rilley, J., Becker, D. (2010). Mapping the world of cultural metadata standards. Retrieved Feb 28, 2017, from http://www.idea.org/blog/2011/11/04/mapping-the-world-of-cultural-metadata-standards/
Ronzino, P., Amico, N., Felicetti, A., & Niccolucci, F. (2013). European standards for the documentation of historic buildings and their relationship with CIDOC CRM. In Practical Experiences with CIDOC CRM and its Extensions (CRMEX), (pp. 70–79). Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1117/paper7.pdf
Ronzino, P., Niccolucci, F., Felicetti, A., & Doerr, M. (2015). CRMba a CRM extension for the documentation of standing buildings. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 71–78. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-015-0160-4
Stead, S. (2008). The CIDOC CRM, a standard for the Integration of cultural information. Retrieved June 28, 2017, from http://personal.sirma.bg/vladimir/crm-tutorial/
Strubulis, C., Flouris, G., Tzitzikas, Y., & Doerr, M. (2014). A case study on propagating and updating provenance information using the CIDOC CRM. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 15 (1), 27-51. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00799-014-0125-z
Vlachidis, A. (2012). Semantic Indexing via Knowledge Organization Systems: Applying the CIDOC-CRM to Archaeological Grey Literature. University of Glamorgan. Retrieved 28 June, 2016, from http://hypermedia.research.southwales.ac.uk/media/files/documents/2013-07-11/Andreas-Vlachidis_Thesis_print_ready.pdf
Vlachidis, A., & Tudhope, D. (2011). Semantic annotation for indexing archaeological context: a prototype development and evaluation. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 240 CCIS, 363–374. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24731-6_37
Vincent, M. L., López-Menchero Bendicho, V. M., Ioannides, M., & Levy, T. E. (Eds.) (2017). Heritage and Archaeology in the Digital Age Acquisition, Curation, and Dissemination of Spatial Cultural Heritage Data. Springer International Publishing. Retrieved Feb. 15, 2017, from, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65370-9