Copyright Infringement in ResearchGate Self-archiving Feature

Document Type : Research َ Article

Author

Associate Professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Kharazmi University

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the extent to which ResearchGate members as authors of journal articles comply with publishers’ copyright policies when they self-archive full-text of their articles on ResearchGate.
Methodology: A random sample of 500 English journal articles available as full-text on ResearchGate was chosen (using a two-step random sampling) and the information of the articles and their authors were collected from ResearchGate. Compliance of their full-text availability then was checked against journal publishers’ policy mentioned in journal’s site or SHERPA/RoMEO.
Results: Of these, 64 (13.4%) were preprint, 26 (5.2%) were post-print and 407 (81.2%) were published (publisher) PDF. The key finding was that 40.2% out of 500 articles infringed the copyright and were non-compliant with publisher policy. Although social sciences had the smallest number of articles overall, their number of non-compliant articles was larger than those of other fields.
Conclusion: Most of non-compliance cases occur when authors use publishers’ PDF for archiving. Given that two-fifths of ResearchGate full-text articles are not aligned with publishers’ copyright policies, authors and ResearchGate need to pay more attention to the issue and take measures for copyright compliance.

Keywords

Main Subjects


اجاق، فرخنده؛ کوشا، کیوان (۱۳۹۰). بررسی الگوی خودآرشیوی نویسندگان ایرانی: مقایسه حوزه‌های علوم و علوم‌اجتماعی، تحقیقات اطلاع رسانی و کتابخانه های عمومی، ۱۷ (۲)، ۲۸۵-۳۰۴.
Cabanac, G. (2016). Bibliogifts in libgen? a study of a text-sharing platform driven by biblioleaks and crowdsourcing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67 (4), 874–884. Doi: 10.1002/asi.23445
Covey, D. T. (2009). Self-archiving journal articles: a case study of faculty practice and missed opportunity. Portal: Libraries and the Academy9 (2), 223-251. Doi: 10.1353/pla.0.0042
Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., & Probets, S. (2003a). RoMEO studies 1: the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving. Journal of Documentation59 (3), 243-277. Doi: 10.1108/00220410310698239
Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., & Probets, S. (2003b). RoMEO studies 4: an analysis of journal publishers' copyright agreements. Learned publishing16 (4), 293-308. Doi: 10.1087/095315103322422053
Inaba, R., & Yamazaki, R. (2015). Survey on Copyright Infringement of Digital Contents: A Case Study of Japanese University Students. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 2-7 August, (pp. 657-660). Springer International Publishing. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21383-5_110
Jamali, H. R., Russell, B., Nicholas, D. & Watkinson, A. (2014). Do online communities support research collaboration? Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66 (6), 603-622. Doi: 10.1108/AJIM-08-2013-0072
Jamali, H. R., & Nabavi, M. (2015). Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google scholar in different subject fields. Scientometrics, 105 (3), 1635-1651. Doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1642-2
Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., & Herman, E. (2016). Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms. Research Evaluation, 25 (1), 37-49. Doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvv032
Laakso, M. (2014). Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed. Scientometrics, 99 (2), 475-494. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3
Martín-Martín, A., Orduña-Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2014). Does Google scholar contain all highly cited documents (1950-2013)? (EC3 Working Papers, 19). Cornell University Library. Retrieved 1 June 2016, from http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8464
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2016). Research gate articles: Age, discipline, audience size, and impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Doi: 10.1002/asi.23675
CAPTCHA Image