Abbasi, M. A., & Liu, H. (2013). Measuring user credibility in social media. In International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction, April 2-5, (pp. 441-448). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer
Agarwal, S., Choubey, L., & Yu, H. (2010). Automatically classifying the role of citations in biomedical articles. In Proceedings of American Medical Informatics Association Fall Symposium (AMIA), (pp. 11-15). Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041379/
Bennett, P. N., El-Arini, K., Joachims, T., & Svore, K. M. (2012). Enriching information retrieval. ACM Sigir Forum, 45 (2), 60-65. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/tj/publications/bennett_etal_11a.pdf
Boldt, A. (2011). Extending ArXiv. org to achieve open peer review and publishing. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 42 (2), 238-242.
Brennan, P. (2012). Uses of computational stylometry to determine demographics for online reputation management. Language Engineering for Online Reputation Management, 15-16. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/workshops/15.LREC%202012%20Online%20Reputation%20Proceedings.pdf
Budden, A. E., Tregenza, T., Aarssen, L. W., Koricheva, J., Leimu, R., & Lortie, C. J. (2008). Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23 (1), 4-6.
Cao, Z., Li, S., Liu, Y., Li, W., & Ji, H. (2015). A novel neural topic model and its supervised extension. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI15/paper/view/9303/9544
Chaa, M., Nouali, O., & Bellot, P. (2018). Combining Tags and Reviews to Improve Social Book Search Performance. In International Conference of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for European Languages, September 10-14, (pp. 64-75). Cham: Springer.
Chelaru, S., Orellana-Rodriguez, C., & Altingovde, I. S. (2014). How useful is social feedback for learning to rank YouTube videos? World Wide Web, 17 (5), 997-1025.
Constantin, C., Du Mouza, C., Faget, Z., & Rigaux, P. (2011). The melodic signature index for fast ontent-based retrieval of symbolic scores. In 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), October 24-28, (pp. 363-368). Retrieved June 6, 2020, from http://ismir2011.ismir.net/papers/PS3-2.pdf
Cronin, B. (2009). Vernacular and vehicular language. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (3), 433-433.
Cui, H., Mittal, V., & Datar, M. (2006). Comparative experiments on sentiment classification for online product reviews. In The Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06), July 16–20, (pp. 1265-1270). Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en/ir/pubs/archive/4.pdf
Dall'Aglio, P. (2006). Peer review and journal models. arXiv preprint physics/0608307. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0608307.pdf
Daniel, H. D. (1993). An evaluation of the peer review process at Angewandte Chemie. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 32 (2), 234-238.
Doslu, M., & Bingol, H. O. (2016). Context sensitive article ranking with citation context analysis. Scientometrics, 108, 653-671.
Eickhoff, C., Li, W., & De Vries, A. P. (2013). Exploiting user comments for audio-visual content indexing and retrieval. In European Conference on Information Retrieval, March 24-27, (pp. 38-49). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Ford, E. (2013). Defining and characterizing open peer review: a review of the literature. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 44 (4), 311-326.
Gillespie, G. W., Chubin, D. E., & Kurzon, G. M. (1985). Experience with NIH peer review: Researchers' cynicism and desire for change. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 10 (3), 44-54.
Golcher, F., & Reznicek, M. (2011). Stylometry and the interplay of topic and L1 in the different annotation layers in the FALKO corpus. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/2022/golcher.pdf?sequence=1
Hartley, J., & Kostoff, R. N. (2003). How useful are key words' in scientific journals? Journal of Information Science, 29 (5), 433-438.
Hille, S., & Bakker, P. (2014). Engaging the social news user: Comments on news sites and Facebook. Journalism Practice, 8 (5), 563-572.
Hsu, C. F., Khabiri, E., & Caverlee, J. (2009). Ranking comments on the social web. In International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (Vol. 4), August 29-31, (pp. 90-97). Calif., Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.
Hu, M., Sun, A., & Lim, E. P. (2007). Comments-oriented blog summarization by sentence extraction. In Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management (pp. 901-904). Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1321440.1321571
Hu, M., Sun, A., & Lim, E. P. (2008). Comments-oriented document summarization: Understanding documents with readers' feedback. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, July 20-24, (pp. 291-298). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Ito, E., & Shimizu, K. (2012). Frequency and link analysis of online novels toward social contents ranking. In 2012 Second International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing, November 1-3, (pp.531-536). IEEE. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6382867
Jenuwine, E. S., & Floyd, J. A. (2004). Comparison of Medical Subject Headings and text-word searches in MEDLINE to retrieve studies on sleep in healthy individuals. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92 (3), 349-353.
Lewis, D. D., & Jones, K. S. (1996). Natural language processing for information retrieval. Communications of the ACM, 39 (1), 92-101.
Li, Q., Wang, J., Chen, Y. P., & Lin, Z. (2010). User comments for news recommendation in forum-based social media. Information Sciences, 180 (24), 4929-4939.
Link, A. M. (1998). US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias. JAMA, 280 (3), 246-247.
Manikonda, L., Meduri, V. V., & Kambhampati, S. (2016). Tweeting the mind and instagramming the heart: Exploring differentiated content sharing on social media. In The Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, May 17-20. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.02718.pdf
Mishne, G., & Glance, N. (2006, May). Leave a reply: an analysis of weblog comments. In Third Annual Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from http://leonidzhukov.net/hse/2011/seminar/papers/www2006-blogcomments.pdf
Nentwich, M. (2005). Quality control in academic publishing: Challenges in the age of cyberscience. Poiesis & Praxis, 3 (3), 181-198.
Nicholson, J., & Alperin, J. P. (2016). A brief survey on peer review in scholarly communication. The Winnower. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://thewinnower.com/papers/4659-a-brief-survey-on-peer-review-in-scholarly-communication#submit
O’reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design Patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1982). Peer review practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5 (2), 187-195.
Potthast, M. (2009). Measuring the descriptiveness of web comments. In Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, July 19-23, (pp. 724-725). New York, NY: ACM.
Potthast, M., Stein, B., Loose, F., & Becker, S. (2012). Information (2010). Towards comment-based cross-media retrieval in. In Proceedings of the comment sphere. ACM Transactions19th international conference on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 3(4), 68. World wide web (pp. 1169-1170). Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2337542.2337553
Ritchie, A., Teufel, S., & Robertson, S. (2006). How to find better index terms through citations. In Proceedings of the Workshop on How Can Computational Linguistics Improve Information Retrieval? (pp. 25-32). Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/1629808.1629813
Ross, J. S., Gross, C. P., Desai, M. M., Hong, Y., Grant, A. O., Daniels, S. R., et al. (2006). Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA, 295 (14), 1675-1680.
Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? a systematic review. F1000Research, 6. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437951/
San Pedro, J., Yeh, T., & Oliver, N. (2012). Leveraging user comments for aesthetic aware image search re-ranking. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, April 16- 20, (pp. 439-448). New York, NY: ACM.
Shu, K., Wang, S., Tang, J., Zafarani, R., & Liu, H. (2017). User identity linkage across online social networks: a review. Acm Sigkdd Explorations Newsletter, 18 (2), 5-17.
Stvilia, B., & Jörgensen, C. (2010). Member activities and quality of tags in a collection of historical photographs in Flickr. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (12), 2477-2489.
Thomas, B., Vinod, P., & Dhanya, K. A. (2014). Multiclass emotion extraction from sentences. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5 (2), 12-15.
Travis, G. D. L., & Collins, H. M. (1991). New light on old boys: Cognitive and institutional particularism in the peer review system. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16 (3), 322-341.
Tregenza, T. (2002). Gender bias in the refereeing process? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17 (8), 349-350.
Voss, J. (2007). Tagging, folksonomy & co-renaissance of manual indexing? arXiv:cs/0701072. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0701072.pdf
Wang, P., Rath, M., Deike, M., & Wu, Q. (2016). Open peer review: an innovation in scientific publishing. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/158312603.pdf
Wang, X., Bian, J., Chang, Y., & Tseng, B. (2012). Model news relatedness through user comments. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, April 16-20, (pp. 629-630). Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2187980.2188161
Wilson, C., Boe, B., Sala, A., Puttaswamy, K. P., & Zhao, B. Y. (2009). User interactions in social networks and their implications. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM European Conference on Computer Systems (pp. 205-218). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://sites.cs.ucsb.edu/~ravenben/publications/pdf/interaction-eurosys09.pdf
Yamamoto, D., Masuda, T., Ohira, S., & Nagao, K. (2008). Video scene annotation based on web social activities. IEEE Multimedia, 15 (3), 22-32.
Yee, W. G., Yates, A., Liu, S., & Frieder, O. (2009). Are web user comments useful for search? Retrieved June 6, 2020, from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-480/paper7.pdf
Yin, X. C., Zhang, B. W., Cui, X. P., Qu, J., Geng, B., Zhou, F., et al. (2016). ISART: a generic framework for searching books with social information. PloS one
(2), e0148479. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148479
Zuva, K., & Zuva, T. (2012). Evaluation of information retrieval systems. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 4 (3), 35-43.