باتلر، پیرس (1382). جنبه‌های نظری علم کتابداری (هوشنگ ابرامی، مترجم). تهران: سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران.
حریری، نجلا (1385). اصول و روش‌های پژوهش کیفی. تهران: دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
دروین، برندا (1383). از نگاه استفاده‌کننده: معرفی روششناسی کیفی-کمّی معنابخشی (ابراهیم افشار، مترجم). کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 25 (1)، 55-68.
دلاور، علی (1374). مبانی نظری و عملی پژوهش در علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، تهران: رشد.
رهادوست، بهار (1389). پژوهش کیفی چیست؟ وبلاگ مدیریت تحقیقات در علوم پزشکی. بازیابی28 مهر 1389، از http://rezamahmoodi.blogfa.com/post-75.aspx
ریسمانباف، امیر (1385). کتابداری، حرفه‌ای مبتلا به فقر نظری - پیامدها و پیشنهادهایی برای بهبود. اطلاع‌شناسی، 4 (1 و 2)، 6- 30.
شکاری، عباس؛ حسین‌پور، محمد (1390). تقابل رویکردهای معرفت‌شناسی پژوهش کمّی و کیفی در علوم انسانی و طبیعی: با تأکید بر رویکرد روششناسی تلفیقی. پژوهش، 3 (1)، 59- 74
عابدی، احمد؛ شواخی، علیرضا (1389). مقایسه روششناسی پژوهش کمّی و کیفی در علوم رفتاری.، راهبرد، 19 (54)، 153-168.
عابدی، حیدرعلی (1385). تحقیقات کیفی. روششناسی علوم انسانی (حوزه و دانشگاه)، 12 (47)، 61-73.
نشاط ، نرگس (1388). تعامل پارادایم‌های پژوهشی در روششناسی. کتاب ماه کلیات (ویژه‌نامه پژوهش)، 13 (3)، 30.
نشاط، نرگس (1390). ضرورت تفکر فرارشته‌ای در مطالعات علم اطلاعات. پژوهشنامه کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی، 1 ( 2)، 11- .28
Afzal, W. (2006). An argument for the increased use of qualitative research in LIS. Emporia State Research Studies, 43 (1), 22-5.
Benediktsson, D. (1989). Hermeneutics: Dimensions toward LIS thinking. Library and Information Science Research, 11 (3), 210-34.
Bradley, J., & Sutton, B. (1993). Reframing the paradigm debate. The Library Quarterly, 63 (4), 405-410.
Bradley, J., & Sutton, B. (Eds.) (1999). Symposium on qualitative research, theory, methods and applications. Library Quarterly, 63 (4), 33-37.
Brookes, C. B. (1980). The foundations of information science: Part I. philosophical aspects. Journal of Information Science, 2 (3-4), 125-33.
Brookes, C. B. (1981). The foundations of information science: Part IV. Information science: the changing paradigm. Journal of Information Science, 3 (1), 3-12.
Budd, J. M. (1995). An epistemological foundation for library and information science. The Library Quarterly, 65 (3), 295-318.
Budd, J. M., & Raber, D. (1996). Discourse analysis: Method and application in the study of information. Information Processing & Management, 32 (2), 217-226.
Budd, J. M. (2005). Phenomenology and information studies. Journal of Documentation, 61 (1), 44-59.
Bundy, M. L., Wasserman, P. (1970). Reader in research methods for librarianship. Dyton: Microsoft Edition.
Busha, C. H. (1978). Research methods. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 25, 254-393.
Busha, C. H., & Purcell, R. (1973). A textual approach for promoting rigorous research in librarianship. Journal of Education for Librarianship, 14 (1), 3-15.
Butler, P. (1933). An Introduction to library science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carnovsky, L. (1957). Methodology in research and applications. Library Trends, 6 (2), 243-246.
Chu, H. (2015). Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 37 (1), 36-41.
Cibangu, S. K. (2013). A memo of qualitative research for information science: toward theory construction. Journal of Documentation, 69 (2), 194-213.
Curtis Wright, H. (1978). Inquiry in science and librarianship. Journal of Library History, 13 (3), 250-264.
Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind's eye of the user: the sense making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In Glazier, J. D. and Powell, R. R. (eds.). Qualitative Research in Information Management (62-84). Englewood, Col. Libraries Unlimited.
Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of knowledge management, 2 (2), 36-46.
Dervin, B., & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3-33.
Fidel, R. (1993). Qualitative methods in information retrieval research. Library and InformationScience Research, 15 (3), 219-47.
Fidel, R. (2008). Are we there yet? Mixed methods research in library and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 30 (4), 265-72.
Fisher, K. E., & Julien, H. (2009). Information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, 43, 317-58.
Galvin, T. J. (1970). Case studies and case method. In Encyclopedia of Library and Information ScienceVol. 4(214-19).
Given, L. (2006). Qualitative research in evidence-based practice: a valuable partnership. Library Hi Tech, 24 (3), 376-86.
Goldhor, H. (1969). Introduction to scientific research in librarianship. Washington: Department of Health Education and Welfare.
Goldhor, H. (1972). An introduction to scientific research in librarianship. Urbana: University of Illinois, GraduateSchool of Library Science.
Grover, R., & Glazier, J. (1985). Implications for application of qualitative methods to library and information science research. Library & information science research, 7 (3), 247-260.
Grover, R., & Glazier, J. (1986). A conceptual framework for theory building in library and information science. Library and Information Science Research, 8 (3), 227-242.
Harris, M. H. (1986a). Review of research in librarianship. Library and Information Science Research, 8 (1), 101-110.
Harris, M. H. (1986b). The dialectic of defeat: Antimonies in research in library and information science. Library Trends, 34 (3), 515-531.
Hjørland, B. (1998). Theory and metatheory of information science: A new interpretation. Journal of Documentation, 54 (5), 606–621.
Jarvelin, K. & Vakkari, P. (1990). Content Analysis of Research Articles in Library and Information Science. Library and Information Science Research, 12 (4), 395-421.
Johnson, D. J. (2003). On contexts of information seeking. Information Processing & Management, 39 (5), 735-60.
Johnson, D. J. (2009). An impressionistic mapping of information behavior with special attention to contexts, rationality, and ignorance. Information Processing & Management, 39 (5), 735-60.
Kaska, N. K. & Rush, J. E. (1980). Library and information science research. In ALA World Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. Chicago: American Library Association.
Katzer, J. (1981). Understanding the research process: an analysis of error. In A Library Science Research Reader and Bibliographic Guide. Littleton: Library Unlimited,
Kumpulainen, S. (1991). Library and information science research in 1975: Content analysis of the journal articles. Libri, 41 (1), 59-76
Lynch, M. J. (1984). Research and librarianship: an uneasy connection. Library Trends, 32 (4), 361-366.
Natoli, j. (1989). Librarianship as a human science: theory, methods and applications. Library Research, 4 (2), 163-74.
Nolin. J. & Astrom, F. (2010). Turning weakness into strength: Strategies for future LIS. Journal of Documentation, 66 (10), 7-27.
Pettigrew, K. E., & McKechnie, L. E. (2001). The use of theory in information science research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (1), 62-73.
Powell, R. R. (1999). Recent trends in research: a methodological essay. Library and Information Science Research, 21 (1), 91-119.
Radford, G. P. (1992). Positivism, Foucault, and the fantasia of the library: conceptions of knowledge and the modern library experience. The Library Quarterly, 64 (4), 408-424.
Sandstrom, R. A., & Sandstrom, E. P. (1995). The use and misuse of anthropological methods in library and information science research. Library Quarterly, 65 (2), 161-99.
Shera, J. (1964). Davin, Bacon, and research in librarianship. Library Trends, 13 (1), 141-49.
Shiflett, O. L. (1984). Clio’s claim: the role of historical research in library and information science. Library trends, 32 (4), 385-406.
Suarez, D. (2010). Evaluating qualitative research studies for evidence based library and information practice. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 5 (2), 75-85.
Sutton, B. (1998). Qualitative research methods in library and information science, in Kent, E. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. (Vol. 62, pp. 84-263). Marcel Dekker, New York: NY.
Tenopir, C. (2003). Use and users of electronic library resources: an overview and analysis of recent research studies. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved 15, May 2016, from http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/pub120abst.html
Vakkari, P. (1998). Growth of theories on information seeking: an analysis of growth of a theoretical research program on the relation between task complexity and information seeking. Information Processing & Management, 34 (2-3), 361-82.
Vakkari, P. (2008). Trends and approaches in information behavior research. Information Research, 13 (4), Retrieved March 29, 2013, from http://InformationR.net/ir/13-4/paper361.html
Wessinger, T. (2005). Information as a value concept: Reconciling theory and practice. Library Philosophy and Practice, 8 (1), Retrieved 16 October, 2016, from www. Webpages .uidaho.edu/~mobolin/wessinger.htm
Williamson, C. C. (1931). The Williamson reports of 1921 and 1923: Including training for library work (1921) and training for library service (1923). Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
Wilson, T. D. (2000). Recent trends in user studies: action research and qualitative methods..Information Research, 5 (3). Retrieved November 26, 2013, from http://informationr.net/ir/5-3/paper76.html
Wright, H. C. (1978). Inquiry in science and librarianship. Journal of Library History, 13 (3) 250-264.
)
ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله