ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Evaluation of Journals of the Knowledge and Information Science Field based on Regulations on Determining the Credibility of the Iranian Scientific Journals
Considering the importance and role of scientific journals in advancing science and also the issue of determining the credibility of journals in scientific societies, the present study evaluates prestigious journals in the field of knowledge and information science based on the criteria of new regulations on determining the credibility of the country's scientific journals. The research approach is quantitative and its type is evaluative. Ten Persian journals approved by the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology in the mentioned field from the website of the Commission for the Review of Periodicals were selected and reviewed. To collect the data, a researcher-made checklist was used with a range of different scores including 50 criteria in eight groups: 1) title, 2) editor-in-chief, 3) editors group, 4) journal format, 5) external features of journals, 6) structural editing, 7) authors, and 8) other criteria. The final results of the research indicate that 86% of the criteria of the mentioned regulation are observed in knowledge and information science journals. The results also reveal that the National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization with a score of 90.26 out of 100 points has the highest rank, followed by the Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management and Scientometrics Research Journal. The results of this study will help the managers and editorial board of the surveyed journals to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the journal and try to improve its quality and its compatibility with the criteria of new regulations on determining the credibility of the country's scientific journals. Furthermore, the results of this research revealed some shortcomings and problems of the mentioned regulation.
https://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_2392_bb60ee587fca28767f17251f48288f86.pdf
2020-07-22
8
20
10.30484/nastinfo.2020.2375.1910
Journals
Evaluation
Knowledge and information science
Regulation on determining the credibility of the country's scientific journals
journal publishing standards
M.
CheshmehSohrabi
sohrabi51@gmail.com
1
Associate professor, Knowledge and Information Science, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
R.
Dehkhodaei
r.dekhodaei@edu.ui.ac.ir
2
M.A. Student, Knowledge and Information Science, University of Isfahan
AUTHOR
ابراهیمی میلاجردی، زینب؛ ریاحینیا، نصرت (1393). مطالعه کمی و کیفی مقالات فصلنامه تحقیقات اطلاعرسانی و کتابخانههای عمومی از سال 1387-1391. تحقیقات اطلاعرسانی و کتابخانههای عمومی، 20 (3)، 423-445.
1
اردلانافتخاری، سامیه؛ چشمهسهرابی، مظفر (1389). ارزیابی کمی و کیفی نشریه کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی آستان قدس رضوی از بهار 1377 تا بهار 1387. کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی، 13 (3)، 53-84.
2
اکبرین، حسامالدین؛ باهنر، علیرضا؛ نکویی جهرمی، امیدعلی؛ و شریفی، حمید (1390). ارزیابی روششناسی مطالعات تجربی منتشرشده در مجله علمی- پژوهشی دانشکده دامپزشکی دانشگاه تهران در مدت 10 سال (1978-1387). اپیدمیولوژی ایران، 7 (1)، 1-6.
3
ایزدی، عبدالرضا؛ امیرپور، زمینه (1393). رعایت استانداردهای نشر موسسه بینالمللی ایزو در نشریههای فارسی کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، 25 (3)، 93-109.
4
بیدگلی، سیدمحمودسادات؛ جمالو، محمد (1398). رعایت استانداردهای نشر مؤسسۀ بینالمللی ایزو در نشریههای فارسی رشتۀ تاریخ. تاریخنگری و تاریخنگاری، 29 (23)، 159-184.
5
ثالثی، محمود؛ مقری، امیرحسین؛ محمدی، احسان؛ یکانینژاد، میرسعید؛ و قنبری، علی (1396). ارزیابی کیفیت چاپ مقالات کارآزمایی بالینی چاپشده در مجله طب نظامی، طی سالهای ۹۴-۷۸. طب نظامی، 19 (2)، 106-125.
6
رضائیان، محسن؛ هادوی، مریم؛ باختر، مرضیه؛ داودی سالستانی، امیر؛ و کریمیان، مهرناز (1393). ارزیابی کیفیت مجلات فارسی و انگلیسی زبان مصوب کمیسیون نشریات علوم پزشکی کشور جمهوری اسلامی ایران در سال 1390: موفقیتها و چالشها. مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان، 13 (2)، 163-174.
7
ستوده، هاجر؛ رزمجو، فاطمه؛ و زارع، لیلا (1388). ارزیابی چگونگی معرفی مجلات علمی- پژوهشی ایران در اینترنت براساس استانداردهای بینالمللی: با تأکید بر ویژگیهای مؤثر بر نمایانی مجلات علمی. کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی، 12 (4)، 205-228.
8
سلطانی، محمدرضا؛ خوشبین، امیررضا (1395). تحلیل و ارزیابی مقالات فصلنامه مدیریت اسلامی (14 شماره). فصلنامه مدیریت اسلامی، 24 (3)، 191-215.
9
صبوری، علیاکبر (1384). ارزیابی مجلات ایرانی فهرستشده در مؤسسه اطلاعات علمی (ISI). رهیافت، 15 (36)، 52-62.
10
علینژاد چمازتکی، فاطمه؛ میرحق جولنگرودی، سعیده (1394). ارزیابی و سنجش مقالات مجله جغرافیا و برنامهریزی طی سالهای 1389-1393 در پایگاه استنادی علوم جهان اسلام ISC. جغرافیا و برنامهریزی، 19 (4)، 329-344.
11
فتحآبادی، جلیل (1389). کندوکاو در یک دهه انتشار مقالات فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت در قلمرو روانشناسی تربیتی (88 – 1379). تعلیم و تربیت،26 (3)، 33-69.
12
کتابی، سعیده؛ شیخ ابومسعودی، علی (1394). ارزیابی کارایی مجلات معتبر علمی حوزه مدیریت براساس تکنیک تحلیل پوششی دادهها. مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کرمان، 12 (3)، 317-327.
13
گیلوری، عباس؛ شهمیرزادی، طیبه؛ یوسفی، احمد؛ بشیری، جواد؛ و کولائیان، فردین (1390). مجلههای فارسی حوزه کشاورزی و استاندارد: میزان همخوانی مجلههای علمی - پژوهـشی فارسـی کـشاورزی بـا استانداردهای نشر مؤسسة بینالمللی ایـزو. پـردازش و مـدیریت اطلاعـات، 26(4)، 1045-1066.
14
مقدم متقی، امیر؛ قلیچپاسه، آشور؛ و باوانپوری، مسعود (1395). بررسی مجله علمی- پژوهشی لسان مبین؛ مطالعه علمسنجی. لسان مبین، 8 (26)، 129-145.
15
میررضایی، محمد؛ شکاری، تقی؛ حسنلاریجانی، حجتاله؛ میررضایی، نعیمه (1395). بررسی کمی و کیفیت متدولوژیک مقالات مجله علمی - پژوهشی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شاهرود (دانش و تندرستی از سال 1386-1391). دانش و تندرستی، 11 (2)، 44-53.
16
نوریافکند، آذر؛ مطلبی، داریوش؛ و علیپور حافظی، مهدی (1392). ارزیابی وبگاه مجلههای کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی براساس ابزار ارزیابی کیفیت (WQET). نظامها و خدمات اطلاعاتی، 2 (3)، 1-12.
17
وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری، کمیسیون بررسی نشریات علمی کشور. (1390). آییننامه جدید تعیین اعتبار نشریات علمی کشور. بازیابی 25 شهریور 1398، از https://rppc.msrt.ir/fa
18
Cokley, K., and Caldwell, L. (2001). Content analysis of the journal of Black Psychology (1985-1999). Journal of Black Psychology, 27 (4), 424-438.
19
Kovendi, D. (1975). La presentation des revues de documentation, la bibliotheconomie et d'archives et les normes de l'ISO. UNESCO Bulletin for Libraries, 29 (4), 221-235.
20
Koufogiannakis, D., Crumley, E., & Slater, L. (2004). A content analysis of librarianship research. Journal of Information Science, 30 (3), 227-239.
21
Lopez, C., and Emilio, D. (1999). ISO standards for the presentation of scientific periodicals: Little known and little used by Spanish biomedical journals. Journal of Documentation, 55 (3), 288-309.
22
Shoegle, C., & Stock, W. G. (2004). Impact and relevance of LIS journals: a scientometric analysis of international and German language LIS journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55 (13), 1155-1168.
23
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Cross Impact Analysis of Driving Forces on the Future of Library Catalogs in Iran
Purpose: To analyze the cross impact of driving forces on the Future of Library Catalogs in Iran. Methodology: This is an applied study using desk research, survey, and cross impact analysis. Cross impact analysis and MICMAC software were used to analyze the cross impact and determine key driving forces to perform mathematical calculations of the cross impact of the influential and affective variables. Findings: The findings showed that the system was unstable. Among the variables, 3 variables were in the group of influential variables, 3 variables in the group of Relay variables, 4 variables in the group of Dependent variables, and 3 variables in the group of independent variables. Finally, four variables such as "quantity and quality of library catalogs in the virtual environment", "modification and updating of tools and standards", "library without walls", and " Interaction between library cataloging professionals and library system designers" were identified as strategic variables. Conclusion: The relationships identified among the driving forces affecting the future of library catalogs in Iran indicate the importance of changing the traditional environment of catalogs and their entry into the new information environment. Attention to identified strategic forces can also drive the chain movement for future of the system.
https://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_2391_62527fbe37eee702513cbc604b1eab9f.pdf
2020-07-22
22
36
10.30484/nastinfo.2020.2418.1921
Library catalogs
driving forces
Cross impact analysis
MICMAC Software
S. R.
Hejazi
razieh.hejazi@gmail.com
1
PhD Candidate, Knowledge & Information Science, Shahid Chamran University, Ahwaz
LEAD_AUTHOR
G.
Heidari
gh.heidari@razi.ac.ir
2
Associate Professor, Knowledge & Information Science, Razi University of Kermanshah
AUTHOR
E.
Geraei
geraei.e@lu.ac.ir
3
Assistant Professor, Knowledge & Information Science, Lorestan University
AUTHOR
اکبریداریان، سعیده (1396). ارزیابی ساختاری و محتوایی بانک مستندات ایران براساس مدل مفهومی فراد. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، 28 (3)، 11-27.
1
حاجیانی، ابراهیم؛ همتی، علیرضا (1394). مروری بر الگوهای روش تحلیل تأثیر متقابل و معرفی الگویی با منطق همبستگی. آیندهپژوهی مدیریت، 26(1)، 69-85.
2
حبیبی، سحر؛ حاجیزینالعابدینی، محسن؛ اصنافی، امیررضا؛ و عمرانی، ابراهیم (1397). مطالعه وضعیت عملکرد درونسازمانی نرمافزارهای کتابخانهای در ایران. کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی، 21 (4)، 67-90.
3
داورپناه، محمدرضا (1381). موانع زیرساختی بهرهگیری از فناوری اطلاعات در کتابخانههای دانشگاهی ایران. کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی 5 (2)، 1-23.
4
روحانی، آرش؛ آجرلو، سعید (1394). آموزش نرمافزار میکمک: قابل استفاده در پروژههای سناریونویسی-آیندهپژوهی. تهران: آرنا.
5
زالی، نادر (1392). آیندهنگاری راهبردی در برنامهریزی و توسعه منطقهای. تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
6
طالبیان، حامد؛ مولایی، محمدمهدی؛ و قراری، فریما (1396). تحلیل ساختاری به روش میکمک فازی در آیندهنگاری راهبردی (مطالعه موردی آیندهپژوهی ایران 1394). آیندهپژوهی ایران، 2 (1)، 75-103.
7
علیپور حافظی، مهدی (1394). یکپارچهسازی معنایی منابع اطلاعاتی در کتابخانههای دیجیتالی ایران. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، 26 (3)، 93-113.
8
فتحیان، اکرم (1395). طراحی الگوی هستانشناسی فرادادهای فهرستهای کتابخانه ملی ایران مبتنی بر روش دادههای پیوندی. پایاننامه دکتری، دانشگاه فردوسی، مشهد.
9
مظفری، علیرضا؛ حاجیزینالعابدینی، محسن؛ و پازوکی، فاطمه (1396). بررسی همخوانی استاندارد توصیف و دسترسی به منبع (آردیای) در فهرست پیشینههای کتابشناختی پیایندها. پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 32 (3)، 897-926.
10
Boydston, J., & Leysen, J. (2014). ARL cataloger librarian roles and responsibilities now and in the future. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52 (2), 229-250.
11
Calhoun, K. (2006). The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools. Retrieved June 10, 2020, from https://www.loc.govcatdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf
12
Godet, M. (1994). From anticipation to action: a handbook of strategic prospective. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
13
Godet, M. (2004). Scenarios and strategies: a toolbox for scenario planning. Paris: LIPSOR.
14
Godet, M., Durance, P., & Gerber, A. (2008). Strategic foresight, la prospective, use and misuse of scenario building. Paris: Cahiers du LIPSOR.
15
Smyth, Ú. (2016). Fingal county libraries: the user’s perception of a next generation library catalogue: a case study based on the recent deployment of encore, the public library’s national catalogue. Unpublished master's thesis, Dublin Business School, Dublin.
16
Weber, M. B. (2015). Interviews and feedback from the profession, In weber, m. b., Rethinking library technical services: Redefining our profession for the future. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
17
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
A Scientometric Analysis of a Decade of the Scientific Activities of the National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization (2009-2018)
Purpose: Analyzing and visualizing the scientific output made by the National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization (NASTINFO) from a scientometric perspective during 2009-2018. Methodology: By extracting needed data from ISC and unifying names and keywords, the scientometric indicators of NASTINFO were determined and made visualized by applying some scientometric software packages. Findings: NASTINFO had a multi-authored authorship pattern and its co-authorship network showed a significant collaboration among its authors. Co-word occurrence and keyword clustering networks revealed that NASTINFO considered its vast variety of related topics. Conclusion: In spite of its progression in the scientific indicators and appropriate development in its special field, NASTINFO needs to increase its citability and visibility for its more influence.
https://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_2394_58a407f09e45905803be92c2082f908e.pdf
2020-07-22
38
50
10.30484/nastinfo.2020.2465.1931
Scientometrics
National Studies on Librarianship and Information Organization (NASTINFO)
Visualization of Science
A. A.
Khasseh
khasseh@gmail.com
1
Faculty Member, Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
AUTHOR
H.
Ghazizade
ghazi.hamid@gmail.com
2
Assistant professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran,
AUTHOR
B.
Fallah Estalakh Jani
bnsd@gmail.com
3
MSc in Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran,
AUTHOR
H.
Mokhtari
mokhtariazad@gmail.com
4
Assistant professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
تیمورخانی، افسانه (1381). تحلیل استنادی مقالات تألیفی فصلنامه کتاب. فصلنامه کتاب، 13 (3)، 32-45.
1
حیدری، غلامرضا؛ زوارقی، رسول؛ و مختارپور، رضا (1396). ساختار نویسندگی و همنویسندگی مطالعات علم اطلاعات و دانششناسی ایران: وضعیت حضور و نفوذ در خارج از مرزها. کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی، 20 (4)، 1-23.
2
درباره نشریه. (بیتا). بازیابی 29 بهمن 1398، از http://nastinfo.nlai.ir/journal/about
3
زوارقی، رسول (1388). بررسی جایگاه دو مفهوم مشارکت و دانشگاه نامرئی در ارتباطات علمی غیررسمی. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، 20 (1)، 51-76.
4
سلک، محسن؛ بزرگی، اشرفالسادات (1389). تحلیل محتوای مقالات منتشرشده در دو نشریه فصلنامه «کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی» و «فصلنامه کتاب» در سالهای 1385 و 1386. دانششناسی، 3 (10)، 25-40.
5
سهیلی، فرامرز؛ خاصه، علیاکبر؛ و کرانیان، پریوش (1397). روند موضوعی مفاهیم حوزه علم اطلاعات و دانششناسی ایران براساس تحلیل همرخدادی واژگان. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، 29 (2)، 171-190.
6
عرفانمنش، محمدامین؛ بصیریان جهرمی، رضا (1392). شبکه همتألیفی مقالات منتشرشده در فصلنامه مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات با استفاده از شاخصهای تحلیل شبکههای اجتماعی. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، 24 (2)، 76-96.
7
عصاره، فریده؛ سهیلی، فرامرز (1392). مفاهیم مرکزیت و تراکم در شبکههای علمی و اجتماعی. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، 24 (3)، 92-108.
8
نوکاریزی، محسن؛ یاری، شیوا (1388). مروری بر متون نمایهسازی و چکیدهنویسی در ایران بین سالهای 1348 تا 1387. مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات، 20 (3)، 271-290.
9
Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12 (3), 159-170.
10
Biglu, M. H. (2008). The influence of references per paper in the SCI to impact factors and the matthew effect. Scientometrics, 74 (3), 453-470.
11
Bordons, M., Aparicio, J., González-Albo, B., & Díaz-Faes, A. A. (2015). The relationship between the research performance of scientists and their position in co-authorship networks in three fields. Journal of Informetrics, 9 (1), 135-144.
12
Chen, X., Wang, S., Tang, Y., & Hao, T. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of event detection in social media. Online Information Review, 43 (1), 29-52.
13
Figuerola, C. G., Marco, F. J. G., & Pinto, M. (2017). Mapping the evolution of library and information science (1978–2014) using topic modeling on LISA. Scientometrics, 112 (3), 1507-1535.
14
Yanbing, S.,Ruifang, Z., Chen, W., Shifan, H., Hua, L., Zhiguang, D. (2019). Bibliometric analysis of Journal of Nursing Management from 1993 to 2018. Journal of Nursing Management. Retrieved June 12, 2020, from https://doi:10.1111/jonm.12925
15
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
A New Way to Do Old Work: Exploring User Experience to Improve Library Service
Purpose: To explore the concept of UX in the context of libraries. Methodology: To find literature about UX in libraries, we searched in online databases; along with we used cite tracking to enrich the results. Findings: Findings illustrated that how UX studies with focus on qualitative approach meet user needs and provide better interaction with library space, services and website. Conclusion: User experience is an emerging trend with similar philosophy of libraries mission statement. It will likely continue to grow as a recognized specialty within the librarianship profession. Librarians can learn UX methods to devise more innovative ways for meeting the user needs in all library system.
https://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_2379_93378098f34928aad329e351d1a40d55.pdf
2020-07-22
52
64
10.30484/nastinfo.2020.1932.1739
User experience
usability
New approaches in information science
UX librarian
library space
library website
User interface
E.
Alvankar
ealvankar@gmail.com
1
PhD Candidate, Knowledge & Information Science, Tehran University
LEAD_AUTHOR
F.
Fahimnia
fahimnia@ut.ac.ir
2
Associate Professor, Knowledge & Information Science, Tehran University,
AUTHOR
N.
Neshat
narges_neshat@yahoo.com
3
Associate Professor, National Library and Archives of Iran
AUTHOR
Nader
Naghshine
nnaghsh@ut.ac.ir
4
Associate Professor, Knowledge & Information Science, Tehran University
AUTHOR
Appleton, L., (2016). User experience (UX) in libraries: let’s get physical (and digital). Insights. 29 (3), 224–227
1
Bell, S. J. (2008). Design Thinking. American Libraries 39 (1/2), 44-49.
2
Bell, S. J. (2014). Staying true to the core: Designing the future academic library experience. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 14(3), 369–382.
3
Blakiston, Rebecca (2013). Developing a Content Strategy for an Academic Library Website. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 25(3), 175-191.
4
Bryant, J. E., G. Matthews, & G, Walton (2009). Academic Libraries and Social and Learning Space: A Case Study of Loughborough University Library, UK. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 41 (1), 7-18.
5
Buddy Pennington, Suzanne Chapman, Amy Fry, Amy Deschenes & Courtney Greene McDonald (2016) Strategies to Improve the User Experience, Serials Review, 42)1(, 47-58.
6
Case, D. O. (2007). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior, Elsevier Ltd.
7
Forrest, C. (2009). Academic libraries as learning spaces: Library effectiveness and the user experience. Georgia Library Quarterly 46 (3), 7-10.
8
Fu, Y; (2019) Exploring user experience on mobile library service by cognitive mapping. In: (Proceedings) CHIIR '19 Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. (397-400). ACM: New York, NY, USA.
9
Garett, J. (2010). The Elements of user experience: user-centered design for the web and beyond, 2nd edition. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
10
Gross J., Sheridan L. (2011). Webscale discovery: the user experience, New library world, 112 (5,6), 236-247.
11
Gullikson, Shelley and Kristin Meyer (2016), Collecting Space Use Data to Improve the UX of Library Space. Weave Journal of User Experience, 1(5). Retrieved 12 June 2020, from http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.502
12
Halvorson, K. (2010). Content strategy for the web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
13
Julien, J. (2012, March 6). Cognition & the intrinsic user experience. UX Magazine. Retrieved 12 June 2020, from http://uxmag.com/articles/cognition-the-intrinsic-userexperience
14
Lidwell,W., & Holden, K. (2003). Universal principles of design. Gloucester, MA: Rockport.
15
Luca, Edward and Bhuva Narayan (2016). Signage by Design: A Design-Thinking Approach to Library User Experience, Weave Journal of Library User Experience, 1 (5). Retrieved 12 June 2020, from http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/weave.12535642.0001.501
16
Murdoch & Hearne (2014). Journey into the user experience: creating a library website that’s not for librarians.VALA 2014 Proceedings. VALA conference.
17
Márquez, J., & Downey, A. (2015). Service design: An introduction to a holistic assessment methodology of library services. Weave: Journal of Library User Experience,1(2).
18
MacDonald, CM (2015) User experience librarians: user advocates, user researchers, usability evaluators, or all of the above? Proceedings of the 78th ASIS&T Annual Meeting Information Science with Impact: Research in and for the Community. Retrieved 12 June 2020, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010055
19
Marsh, Hilary (2013). “Content strategy for library websites” workshop for LACONI (Library Administrators Conference of Northern Illinois) Retrieved 12 June 2020, from http://www.hilarymarsh.com/content-strategy-libraries
20
Mathews, B. (2007). Shifting My Focus – the user experience. The Ubiquitous Librarian. Retrieved 12 June 2020, from http://theubiquitouslibrarian.typepad.com/the_ubiquitous_librarian/2007/09/shifting-my-foc.html
21
Norman, D. A(1988) The Design of Everyday Things.” New York: Basic Books.
22
Norman, D., Miller, J., & Henderson, A. (1995). What you see, some of what’s in the future, and how we go about doing it: HI at apple computer. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 1995), Denver, Colorado, USA.
23
Priestner, A and Borg, M (2016). Uncovering complexity and detail: the UX proposition In: Priestner, A and Borg, Meds. User Experience in Libraries: Applying Ethnography and Human-Centred Design. London: Routledge
24
Ramsden, B (2016). Using Ethnographic Methods to Study Library Use In: Priestner, A and Borg, Meds. User Experience in Libraries: Applying Ethnography and Human-Centred Design. London: Routledge.
25
Rosenfeld, L., Peter Morville and Jorge Arango. (2015). Information Architecture: For the Web and Beyond (4th. ed.). O’Reilly Media, Inc.
26
Sadeh, Tamar (2008) "User experience in the library: a case study", New Library World, 109 (1/2), 7-24.
27
Schmidt, Aaron and Amanda Etches (2014). User experience (UX) designfor libraries, ALA publication, Chicago.
28
Shieh, Jiann-Cherng (2012). From website log to findability, The Electronic Library, 30 (5) 707-720.
29
Walton, G. (2015). What User Experience (UX) Means for Academic Libraries. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 21(1): 1-3.
30
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
National Library and Archives of IRAN in Thesis
Purpose: Over the six decades since LIS education began in Iran, considerable number of theses have been defended with the National Library and Archives of Iran (NLAI) being the subject of them entirely or partly. This paper aims to inform the authorities of the NLAI as well as the LIS academics and students of this record. Methodology: Relevant titles were identified by examining numerous bibliographic databases. Titles, abstracts, and sometimes the content of the theses were closely studied to determine their subjects, then checked with subject authority lists to put them in subject groups. Findings: 409 theses were identified in four main areas, i.e. organizational management, organization of information, services and information dissemination, and collection management. More than half of the theses belonged to state public universities. NLAI academic staff supervised or co-supervised 28٪ of the theses. Around 52% titles were surveys, and around 32% used questionnaires for gathering data. The Department of Processing Department and the Research and Education more than other parts of the NLAI were the subjects of the theses. Conclusion: Topics related to organizational management have attracted the interests of students the most. Few theses have addressed the chronic problems of the national collection and archives. Use and user studies are almost absent. A comparison between the works done by the NLAI staff and universities, as well as a study that examines the extent to which NLAI departments have employed the findings of the theses is suggested.
https://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_2390_411af1c1757375cb3f8b5623151afe13.pdf
2020-07-22
66
84
10.30484/nastinfo.2020.2366.1909
theses
Library and information science
National Library and Archives of Iran
S.
Nozari
nozari.sudabeh@gmail.com
1
Assistant Professor, National Library and Archives of Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
S.
Nozar
samaneh.nouzar@gmail.com
2
PhD Candidate, Knowledge and Information Science; Head of Quality Control, Methods Improvement and Administration Evolution
AUTHOR
انصاری، نوشآفرین (1387). تأثیر کتابخانه ملی بر آموزش کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی. کتاب ماه کلیات، ش 133 (دی): 6 –51.
1
بابایی، نرگس (1392) تحلیل و بررسی پایاننامههای تدوینشده با موضوع سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران شمال.
2
حیاتی، زهیر (۱۳۹۸). آموزش کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی در ایران. در دائرهالمعارف کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی. بازیابی 23 مهر 1398، از http://portal.nlai.ir/daka
3
خسروی، فریبرز؛ ترکاشوند، فتانه؛ قدیمی، نرگس (۱۳۹۲). اصطلاحنامه فرهنگی سه زبانه فارسی - انگلیسی - عربی: استانداردها و رهنمودها. تهران: سازمان اسناد و کتابخانه ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران.
4
صدیقبهزادی، ماندانا (۱۳۷۹). چکیدهنامه پایاننامههای کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی. با همکاری سیمین حسیننیا. تهران: کتابخانه ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مرکز اطلاعرسانی و خدمات علمی جهاد سازندگی.
5
JITA Classification System of Library and Information Science. Retrieved August 14, 2019, from https://old.datahub.io/dataset/jita
6
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Measuring Similarities between Open Peer Review Comments and Contents of Scientific Articles: a Natural Language Processing Technique Inquiry
Purpose: The social web provides a platform for publicizing open peer review reports. In this sphere, journal readers, authors, editors, and reviewers can involve in multilateral discussions on the reviewed papers and share their comments and viewpoints on the merits and probable pitfalls of papers. Open peer review comments may, hence, reflect the features of their mother articles. To identify this potential, the present study investigates to what extent similar comments accurately predict similar papers. Methodology: Applying natural language processing techniques, it analyzes the contents of a sample of papers in medicine and life sciences and the comments received by them. To do so, a test collection is built from the papers openly published on F1000Research, an open access publishing platform that adheres to an open peer reviewing process by transparently providing the public with peer review reports, authors’ responses, and users’ comments. The test collection consists of 2212 papers and their comments. 100 papers are randomly selected as seed documents that serve as queries. The similarities between the comments and the contents of the papers are calculated using Cosine similarity of TF-IDF values. The TF-IDF values are calculated for both unigrams and bigrams extracted from the contents and comments. The correlation between the content and comment similarities is analyzed using Spearman correlation, given the non-normality of the data distributions. The accuracy of prediction of the papers’ content similarity by the similarity of their comments is tested using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Findings: The results of the Spearman correlation revealed a significant correlation between the content and comment similarities. This signifies that similar papers are more likely to receive similar comments and vice versa. The ROC curves show that similar comments can significantly identify similar papers, either at unigram or bigram level. The prediction is highly accurate. Conclusion: Similar comments are effective in representing similar papers. In other words, similar comments are expected to present similar papers. This finding has implications for interactive information retrieval systems, where users are interested in reading experts’ comments on a given paper before viewing or downloading the paper itself. The findings also may pave the path towards new studies about the application of the comments in such spheres as information retrieval, evaluation or classification, where content similarity is of importance.
https://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_2402_196a7d9145c1e3b43941c1ff975ee0ab.pdf
2020-07-22
86
103
10.30484/nastinfo.2020.2480.1937
comments
peer reviewing
Natural Language Processing
similarity
ROC curve analysis
K.
Rashidi Sharifabad
kia_rsh85@yahoo.com
1
PhD Candidate, Knowledge and Information Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
AUTHOR
H.
Sotodeh
sotudeh@shirazu.ac.ir
2
Associate Professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
M.
Mirzabeigi
mmirzabeigi@gmail.com
3
Associate Professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
AUTHOR
S.M.
Fakhrahmad
fakhrahmad@shirazu.ac.ir
4
Assistant Professor, Computer Science and Engineering and Information Technology, Shiraz
AUTHOR
Abbasi, M. A., & Liu, H. (2013). Measuring user credibility in social media. In International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction, April 2-5, (pp. 441-448). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer
1
Agarwal, S., Choubey, L., & Yu, H. (2010). Automatically classifying the role of citations in biomedical articles. In Proceedings of American Medical Informatics Association Fall Symposium (AMIA), (pp. 11-15). Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3041379/
2
Bennett, P. N., El-Arini, K., Joachims, T., & Svore, K. M. (2012). Enriching information retrieval. ACM Sigir Forum, 45 (2), 60-65. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/tj/publications/bennett_etal_11a.pdf
3
Boldt, A. (2011). Extending ArXiv. org to achieve open peer review and publishing. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 42 (2), 238-242.
4
Brennan, P. (2012). Uses of computational stylometry to determine demographics for online reputation management. Language Engineering for Online Reputation Management, 15-16. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/workshops/15.LREC%202012%20Online%20Reputation%20Proceedings.pdf
5
Budden, A. E., Tregenza, T., Aarssen, L. W., Koricheva, J., Leimu, R., & Lortie, C. J. (2008). Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23 (1), 4-6.
6
Cao, Z., Li, S., Liu, Y., Li, W., & Ji, H. (2015). A novel neural topic model and its supervised extension. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/AAAI/AAAI15/paper/view/9303/9544
7
Chaa, M., Nouali, O., & Bellot, P. (2018). Combining Tags and Reviews to Improve Social Book Search Performance. In International Conference of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for European Languages, September 10-14, (pp. 64-75). Cham: Springer.
8
Chelaru, S., Orellana-Rodriguez, C., & Altingovde, I. S. (2014). How useful is social feedback for learning to rank YouTube videos? World Wide Web, 17 (5), 997-1025.
9
Constantin, C., Du Mouza, C., Faget, Z., & Rigaux, P. (2011). The melodic signature index for fast ontent-based retrieval of symbolic scores. In 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), October 24-28, (pp. 363-368). Retrieved June 6, 2020, from http://ismir2011.ismir.net/papers/PS3-2.pdf
10
Cronin, B. (2009). Vernacular and vehicular language. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (3), 433-433.
11
Cui, H., Mittal, V., & Datar, M. (2006). Comparative experiments on sentiment classification for online product reviews. In The Twenty-First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06), July 16–20, (pp. 1265-1270). Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en/ir/pubs/archive/4.pdf
12
Dall'Aglio, P. (2006). Peer review and journal models. arXiv preprint physics/0608307. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0608307.pdf
13
Daniel, H. D. (1993). An evaluation of the peer review process at Angewandte Chemie. Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 32 (2), 234-238.
14
Doslu, M., & Bingol, H. O. (2016). Context sensitive article ranking with citation context analysis. Scientometrics, 108, 653-671.
15
Eickhoff, C., Li, W., & De Vries, A. P. (2013). Exploiting user comments for audio-visual content indexing and retrieval. In European Conference on Information Retrieval, March 24-27, (pp. 38-49). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
16
Ford, E. (2013). Defining and characterizing open peer review: a review of the literature. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 44 (4), 311-326.
17
Gillespie, G. W., Chubin, D. E., & Kurzon, G. M. (1985). Experience with NIH peer review: Researchers' cynicism and desire for change. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 10 (3), 44-54.
18
Golcher, F., & Reznicek, M. (2011). Stylometry and the interplay of topic and L1 in the different annotation layers in the FALKO corpus. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/2022/golcher.pdf?sequence=1
19
Hartley, J., & Kostoff, R. N. (2003). How useful are key words' in scientific journals? Journal of Information Science, 29 (5), 433-438.
20
Hille, S., & Bakker, P. (2014). Engaging the social news user: Comments on news sites and Facebook. Journalism Practice, 8 (5), 563-572.
21
Hsu, C. F., Khabiri, E., & Caverlee, J. (2009). Ranking comments on the social web. In International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering (Vol. 4), August 29-31, (pp. 90-97). Calif., Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society.
22
Hu, M., Sun, A., & Lim, E. P. (2007). Comments-oriented blog summarization by sentence extraction. In Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management (pp. 901-904). Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1321440.1321571
23
Hu, M., Sun, A., & Lim, E. P. (2008). Comments-oriented document summarization: Understanding documents with readers' feedback. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, July 20-24, (pp. 291-298). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
24
Ito, E., & Shimizu, K. (2012). Frequency and link analysis of online novels toward social contents ranking. In 2012 Second International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing, November 1-3, (pp.531-536). IEEE. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6382867
25
Jenuwine, E. S., & Floyd, J. A. (2004). Comparison of Medical Subject Headings and text-word searches in MEDLINE to retrieve studies on sleep in healthy individuals. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92 (3), 349-353.
26
Lewis, D. D., & Jones, K. S. (1996). Natural language processing for information retrieval. Communications of the ACM, 39 (1), 92-101.
27
Li, Q., Wang, J., Chen, Y. P., & Lin, Z. (2010). User comments for news recommendation in forum-based social media. Information Sciences, 180 (24), 4929-4939.
28
Link, A. M. (1998). US and non-US submissions: an analysis of reviewer bias. JAMA, 280 (3), 246-247.
29
Manikonda, L., Meduri, V. V., & Kambhampati, S. (2016). Tweeting the mind and instagramming the heart: Exploring differentiated content sharing on social media. In The Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, May 17-20. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.02718.pdf
30
Mishne, G., & Glance, N. (2006, May). Leave a reply: an analysis of weblog comments. In Third Annual Workshop on the Weblogging Ecosystem. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from http://leonidzhukov.net/hse/2011/seminar/papers/www2006-blogcomments.pdf
31
Nentwich, M. (2005). Quality control in academic publishing: Challenges in the age of cyberscience. Poiesis & Praxis, 3 (3), 181-198.
32
Nicholson, J., & Alperin, J. P. (2016). A brief survey on peer review in scholarly communication. The Winnower. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://thewinnower.com/papers/4659-a-brief-survey-on-peer-review-in-scholarly-communication#submit
33
O’reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design Patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html
34
Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1982). Peer review practices of psychological journals: the fate of published articles, submitted again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5 (2), 187-195.
35
Potthast, M. (2009). Measuring the descriptiveness of web comments. In Proceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, July 19-23, (pp. 724-725). New York, NY: ACM.
36
Potthast, M., Stein, B., & Becker, S. (2010). Towards comment-based cross-media retrieval. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/1772690.1772858
37
Potthast, M., Stein, B., Loose, F., & Becker, S. (2012). Information (2010). Towards comment-based cross-media retrieval in. In Proceedings of the comment sphere. ACM Transactions19th international conference on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 3(4), 68. World wide web (pp. 1169-1170). Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2337542.2337553
38
Ritchie, A., Teufel, S., & Robertson, S. (2006). How to find better index terms through citations. In Proceedings of the Workshop on How Can Computational Linguistics Improve Information Retrieval? (pp. 25-32). Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/1629808.1629813
39
Ross, J. S., Gross, C. P., Desai, M. M., Hong, Y., Grant, A. O., Daniels, S. R., et al. (2006). Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA, 295 (14), 1675-1680.
40
Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? a systematic review. F1000Research, 6. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5437951/
41
San Pedro, J., Yeh, T., & Oliver, N. (2012). Leveraging user comments for aesthetic aware image search re-ranking. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web, April 16- 20, (pp. 439-448). New York, NY: ACM.
42
Shu, K., Wang, S., Tang, J., Zafarani, R., & Liu, H. (2017). User identity linkage across online social networks: a review. Acm Sigkdd Explorations Newsletter, 18 (2), 5-17.
43
Stvilia, B., & Jörgensen, C. (2010). Member activities and quality of tags in a collection of historical photographs in Flickr. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (12), 2477-2489.
44
Thomas, B., Vinod, P., & Dhanya, K. A. (2014). Multiclass emotion extraction from sentences. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 5 (2), 12-15.
45
Travis, G. D. L., & Collins, H. M. (1991). New light on old boys: Cognitive and institutional particularism in the peer review system. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16 (3), 322-341.
46
Tregenza, T. (2002). Gender bias in the refereeing process? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17 (8), 349-350.
47
Voss, J. (2007). Tagging, folksonomy & co-renaissance of manual indexing? arXiv:cs/0701072. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0701072.pdf
48
Wang, P., Rath, M., Deike, M., & Wu, Q. (2016). Open peer review: an innovation in scientific publishing. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/158312603.pdf
49
Wang, X., Bian, J., Chang, Y., & Tseng, B. (2012). Model news relatedness through user comments. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, April 16-20, (pp. 629-630). Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2187980.2188161
50
Wilson, C., Boe, B., Sala, A., Puttaswamy, K. P., & Zhao, B. Y. (2009). User interactions in social networks and their implications. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM European Conference on Computer Systems (pp. 205-218). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved June 9, 2020, from https://sites.cs.ucsb.edu/~ravenben/publications/pdf/interaction-eurosys09.pdf
51
Yamamoto, D., Masuda, T., Ohira, S., & Nagao, K. (2008). Video scene annotation based on web social activities. IEEE Multimedia, 15 (3), 22-32.
52
Yee, W. G., Yates, A., Liu, S., & Frieder, O. (2009). Are web user comments useful for search? Retrieved June 6, 2020, from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-480/paper7.pdf
53
Yin, X. C., Zhang, B. W., Cui, X. P., Qu, J., Geng, B., Zhou, F., et al. (2016). ISART: a generic framework for searching books with social information. PloS one, 11 (2), e0148479. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148479
54
Zuva, K., & Zuva, T. (2012). Evaluation of information retrieval systems. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 4 (3), 35-43.
55
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Information Quality Assessment Criteria for Technical Documentation Information Systems: A Systematic Review
Purpose: To systematically review research literature on the use of systems concepts to explore information quality assessment criteria. Methodology: Data was collected from relevant research explored in domestic and foreign databases, published between 2009-2019. 58 works were identified of which completeness and relevance of was examined. As a result, 15 documents were selected and analyzed using Cochran's systematic review methodology Findings: Criteria for evaluating information quality in technical documentation information systems could be divided into organizational, individual, information, technological, and systematic. Conclusion: The categorization of such metrics helps knowledge-based and project-based companies to evaluate the quality of their company’s information systems for further improvement.
https://nastinfo.nlai.ir/article_2393_5dbbee72cf6e4043da303298a69fb6f0.pdf
2020-07-22
104
114
10.30484/nastinfo.2020.2467.1932
Information systems
Technical Documentation
Quality of Information Provisioning
System evaluation
Criteria Evaluation
S.
Khademizadeh
s.khademi@scu.ac.ir
1
Assistant Professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
LEAD_AUTHOR
A. H.
Farajpahlu
farajpahlou@scu.ac.ir
2
Professor, Knowledge and Information Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
AUTHOR
S.
Ghasemizadeh
shadi.ghasemi7474@gmail.com
3
MSc in Knowledge and Information Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Ira
AUTHOR
تیموری تابیه، مهتاب (1391). بررسی نحوة جریان دانش در شرکتهای دانشبنیان پارک علم و فناوری دانشگاه تهـران و ارائة مدل مفهومی. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران.
1
جزایری، ماندانا؛ فراهی، احمد؛ و نوروزی، مهدی (1389). بررسی ضرورت استفاده از سیستمهای اطلاعاتی در مستندسازی فنی پروژههای عمرانی. حسابداری مدیریت، 3 (5)، 75-86.
2
حاجی شمسایی، علی؛ نوشینفرد، فاطمه؛ و بابالحوائجی، فهیمه (1396). شناسایی شاخصها و عوامل کیفی مؤثر بر تولید و توزیع اطلاعات و دانش در پارکهای علم و فناوری ایران. مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، 9 (2)، 253-276.
3
رهنورد، فرجالله؛ حاجیمحمدعلیها، رضا (1385). اثربخشی سیستم اطلاعاتی مدیریت: مطالعه موردی. فرایند مدیریت و توسعه، 20 (3 و 4)، 4-12.
4
لاودن، کنثسی؛ لاودن، جینپریس (۱۳77). نظامهای اطلاعات مدیریت (ن.ا.م.) سازمان و فناوری: شایستهترین منبع پژوهشی- دانشگاهی با همکاری 52 تن از استادان برجسته دانشگاههای جهان. برداشت و نگارش به فارسی عبدالرضا رضائینژاد. تهران: خدمات فرهنگی رسا.
5
لگزیان، محمد؛ ناظمی، شمسالدین؛ و دادمند، فاطمه (1389). ارزیابی موفقیت سامانه اطلاعاتی مالی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد با بهکارگیری مدل تعدیلشده دلون و مکلین. پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 27 (3)، 577-596.
6
محرابیون محمدی، محمد؛ شهریاری، غلامرضا؛ و زارع رواسان، احد (1392). شناسایی و دستهبندی عوامل حیاتی موفقیت پیادهسازی چارچوب کتابخانه زیرساخت فناوری اطلاعات در ایران. مطالعات مدیریت کسب و کار هوشمند، 2 (5)، 41-71.
7
Adam, A. (2008). Implementing electronic document and record management systems. New York: Auerbach Publications.
8
Ariel, M. (2015). Content strategy: the new philosophy of technical documentation. Retrieved May 25, 2020, from https://opensource.com/business/15/6/documentation-content-strategy
9
Chung, W. Y., Fisher, C. W., & Wang, R. Y. (2002). What skills matter in data quality? In: Proceedings of seventh international conference on information quality (ICIQ), 331-341.
10
Cox, R. J. (2001). Managing records as evidence and information. Westport, Connecticut: Quorum Books.
11
Gonzalez, R. A., & Bharosa, N. (2009). A framework linking information quality dimensions and coordination challenges during interagency crisis response. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 05 - 08. IEEE. Retrieved May 25, 2020, from https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2009.528
12
Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., & Wong, B. (2010). Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19 (3), 207-228.
13
Henderson, L. K., Craig, J. C., Willis, N. S., Tovey, D., & Webster, A. C. (2010). How to write a Cochrane systematic review. Nephrology, 15 (6), 617-24.
14
Kiplie, F. H., Yatin, S. F. M., Angutim, M., & Abdul Hamid, N. H. (2018). System development for document management system. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8 (9), 748-757.
15
Öberg, L. M., & Borglund, E. (2006). What are the characteristics of records? International Journal of Public Information Systems, 2 (1), 55-76. Retrieved May 25, 2020, from http://www.ijpis.net/ojs/index.php/IJPIS/article/view/29/25
16
Oprea, D., & Mesnita, G. (2006). The Information Systems Documentation - Another Problem for Project Management. Managing Information in the Digital Economy, 332-338. Retrieved May 25, 2020, http://ssrn.com/abstract=946785
17
Palmius, J. (2007). Criteria for measuring and comparing information systems. In Proceedings of the 30th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia IRIS. Retrieved May 25, 2020, from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:356489/FULLTEXT01.pdf
18
Palmius, J. (2010). Organization-level information systems: Tools for supporting the development process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mid Sweden University, Östersund.
19
Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Barroso J. (2006). Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Res Sch, 13 (1), 29.
20
Thomassen, T. (2001). A first introduction to archival science. Archival science, 1 (4), 373-385.
21
Wingkvist, A., Ericsson, M., Lincke, R., & Löwe, W. (2010). A metrics-based approach to technical documentation quality. In Seventh International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, September 29 - October 2, 476-481. IEEE.
22
Xu, H. (2009). Data quality issues for accounting information systems' implementation: Systems, stakeholders, and organizational factors. Journal of Technology Research, 1 (1), 1-11.
23